MLS-C01 AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Questions and Answers

To develop a daily ETL workflow containing multiple ETL jobs that can start as soon as data is uploaded to Amazon S3, the best configuration is to use AWS Lambda to trigger an AWS Step Functions workflow to wait for dataset uploads to complete in Amazon S3. Use AWS Glue to join the datasets. Use an Amazon CloudWatch alarm to send an SNS notification to the Administrator in the case of a failure.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can use Lambda to create functions that respond to events such as data uploads to Amazon S3. You can also use Lambda to invoke other AWS services such as AWS Step Functions and AWS Glue.

AWS Step Functions is a service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. You can use Step Functions to create a state machine that defines the sequence and logic of your ETL workflow. You can also use Step Functions to handle errors and retries, and to monitor the execution status of your workflow.

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that makes it easy to discover, prepare, and combine data for analytics. You can use Glue to create and run ETL jobs that can join data from multiple sources in Amazon S3. You can also use Glue to catalog your data and make it searchable and queryable.

Amazon CloudWatch is a service that monitors your AWS resources and applications. You can use CloudWatch to create alarms that trigger actions when a metric or a log event meets a specified threshold. You can also use CloudWatch to send notifications to Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) topics, which can then deliver the notifications to subscribers such as email addresses or phone numbers.

Therefore, by using these services together, you can achieve the following benefits:

You can start the ETL workflow as soon as data is uploaded to Amazon S3 by using Lambda functions to trigger Step Functions workflows.

You can wait for all the datasets to be available in Amazon S3 by using Step Functions to poll the S3 buckets and check the data completeness.

You can join the datasets with terabyte-sized datasets in Amazon S3 by using Glue ETL jobs that can scale and parallelize the data processing.

You can store the results of joining datasets in Amazon S3 by using Glue ETL jobs to write the output to S3 buckets.

You can send a notification to the Administrator if one of the jobs fails by using CloudWatch alarms to monitor the Step Functions or Glue metrics and send SNS notifications in case of a failure.

For a repository containing a large and dynamically scaling collection of images, Amazon S3 is ideal due to its scalability and versioning capabilities. Amazon S3 natively supports automatic scaling to accommodate increasing storage needs and allows versioning, which enables tracking and managing different versions of objects.

To meet the requirement of maintaining multiple, immediately accessible copies of data across AWS Regions, S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR) can be enabled. CRR automatically replicates new or updated objects to a specified destination bucket in another AWS Region, ensuring low-latency access and disaster recovery. By setting up CRR with versioning enabled, the data scientist can achieve a multi-Region, scalable, and version-controlled repository in Amazon S3.

The SageMaker Spark library is a library that enables Apache Spark applications to integrate with Amazon SageMaker for training and hosting machine learning models. The library provides several features, such as:

Estimators: Classes that allow Spark users to train Amazon SageMaker models and host them on Amazon SageMaker endpoints using the Spark MLlib Pipelines API. The library supports various built-in algorithms, such as linear learner, XGBoost, K-means, etc., as well as custom algorithms using Docker containers.

Model classes: Classes that wrap Amazon SageMaker models in a Spark MLlib Model abstraction. This allows Spark users to use Amazon SageMaker endpoints for inference within Spark applications.

Data sources: Classes that allow Spark users to read data from Amazon S3 using the Spark Data Sources API. The library supports various data formats, such as CSV, LibSVM, RecordIO, etc.

To integrate the Spark application with SageMaker, the Machine Learning Specialist should do the following:

Install the SageMaker Spark library in the Spark environment. This can be done by using Maven, pip, or downloading the JAR file from GitHub.

Use the appropriate estimator from the SageMaker Spark Library to train a model. For example, to train a linear learner model, the Specialist can use the following code:

Use the sageMakerModel. transform method to get inferences from the model hosted in SageMaker. For example, to get predictions for a test DataFrame, the Specialist can use the following code:

References:

[SageMaker Spark]: A documentation page that introduces the SageMaker Spark library and its features.

[SageMaker Spark GitHub Repository]: A GitHub repository that contains the source code, examples, and installation instructions for the SageMaker Spark library.

The Hyperband tuning strategy is a multi-fidelity based tuning strategy that dynamically reallocates resources to the most promising hyperparameter configurations. Hyperband uses both intermediate and final results of training jobs to stop under-performing jobs and reallocate epochs to well-utilized hyperparameter configurations. Hyperband can provide up to three times faster hyperparameter tuning compared to other strategies1. Setting a lower value for the MaxNumberOfTrainingJobs parameter can also reduce the computation time for the hyperparameter tuning job by limiting the number of training jobs that the tuning job can launch. This can help avoid unnecessary or redundant training jobs that do not improve the objective metric.

The other options are not effective ways to reduce the computation time for the hyperparameter tuning job. Increasing the number of hyperparameters will increase the complexity and dimensionality of the search space, which can result in longer computation time and lower performance. Using the grid search tuning strategy will also increase the computation time, as grid search methodically searches through every combination of hyperparameter values, which can be very expensive and inefficient for large search spaces. Setting a lower value for the MaxParallelTrainingJobs parameter will reduce the number of training jobs that can run in parallel, which can slow down the tuning process and increase the waiting time.

References:

•How Hyperparameter Tuning Works

•Best Practices for Hyperparameter Tuning

•HyperparameterTuner

•Amazon SageMaker Automatic Model Tuning now provides up to three times faster hyperparameter tuning with Hyperband

Mini-batch gradient descent is a variant of gradient descent that updates the model parameters using a subset of the training data (called a mini-batch) at each iteration. The learning rate is a hyperparameter that controls how much the model parameters change in response to the gradient. If the learning rate is very high, the model parameters may overshoot the optimal values and oscillate around the minimum of the cost function. This can cause the training accuracy to fluctuate and prevent the model from converging to a stable solution. To avoid this issue, the learning rate should be chosen carefully, such as by using a learning rate decay schedule or an adaptive learning rate algorithm1. Alternatively, the batch size can be increased to reduce the variance of the gradient estimates2. However, the batch size should not be too big, as this can slow down the training process and reduce the generalization ability of the model3. Dataset shuffling and class distribution are not likely to cause oscillations in training accuracy, as they do not affect the gradient updates directly. Dataset shuffling can help avoid getting stuck in local minima and improve the convergence speed of mini-batch gradient descent4. Class distribution can affect the performance and fairness of the model, especially if the dataset is imbalanced, but it does not necessarily cause fluctuations in training accuracy.

 The issue described in the question is a sign of overfitting, which is a common problem in machine learning when the model learns the noise and details of the training data too well and fails to generalize to new and unseen data. Overfitting can result in a low training error rate but a high test error rate, which indicates poor performance and validity of the model. There are several techniques that can be used to prevent or reduce overfitting, such as data augmentation and regularization.

Data augmentation is a technique that applies various transformations to the original training data, such as rotation, scaling, cropping, flipping, adding noise, changing brightness, etc., to create new and diverse data samples. Data augmentation can increase the size and diversity of the training data, which can help the model learn more features and patterns and reduce the variance of the model. Data augmentation is especially useful for image data, as it can simulate different scenarios and perspectives that the model may encounter in real life. For example, in the question, the device uses a camera to observe drivers’ behavior, so data augmentation can help the model deal with different lighting conditions, angles, distances, etc. Data augmentation can be done using various libraries and frameworks, such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, Keras, OpenCV, etc12

Regularization is a technique that adds a penalty term to the model’s objective function, which is typically based on the model’s parameters. Regularization can reduce the complexity and flexibility of the model, which can prevent overfitting by avoiding learning the noise and details of the training data. Regularization can also improve the stability and robustness of the model, as it can reduce the sensitivity of the model to small fluctuations in the data. There are different types of regularization, such as L1, L2, dropout, etc., but they all have the same goal of reducing overfitting. L2 regularization, also known as weight decay or ridge regression, is one of the most common and effective regularization techniques. L2 regularization adds the squared norm of the model’s parameters multiplied by a regularization parameter (lambda) to the model’s objective function. L2 regularization can shrink the model’s parameters towards zero, which can reduce the variance of the model and improve the generalization ability of the model. L2 regularization can be implemented using various libraries and frameworks, such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, Keras, Scikit-learn, etc34

The other options are not valid or relevant for resolving the issue of overfitting. Adding vanishing gradient to the model is not a technique, but a problem that occurs when the gradient of the model’s objective function becomes very small and the model stops learning. Making the neural network architecture complex is not a solution, but a possible cause of overfitting, as a complex model can have more parameters and more flexibility to fit the training data too well. Using gradient checking in the model is not a technique, but a debugging method that verifies the correctness of the gradient computation in the model. Gradient checking is not related to overfitting, but to the implementation of the model.

 To meet the requirements with the least operational overhead, the company should use AWS Glue crawlers, AWS Glue workflows and jobs, and Amazon Fraud Detector. AWS Glue crawlers can scan the data in Amazon S3 and identify the schema, which is then stored in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. AWS Glue workflows and jobs can perform data transformations on the data in Amazon S3 using serverless Spark or Python scripts. Amazon Fraud Detector can train a model to detect fraud using the transformed data and the company’s historical fraud labels, and then generate fraud predictions using a simple API call.

Option A is incorrect because Amazon Athena is a serverless query service that can analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL, but it does not perform data transformations or fraud detection.

Option C is incorrect because Amazon Redshift is a cloud data warehouse that can store and query data using SQL, but it requires provisioning and managing clusters, which adds operational overhead. Moreover, Amazon Redshift does not provide a built-in fraud detection capability.

Option E is incorrect because Amazon Redshift ML is a feature that allows users to create, train, and deploy machine learning models using SQL commands in Amazon Redshift. However, using Amazon Redshift ML would require loading the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift, which adds complexity and cost. Also, Amazon Redshift ML does not support fraud detection as a use case.

References:

AWS Glue Crawlers

AWS Glue Workflows and Jobs

Amazon Fraud Detector

 The problem described in the question is a case of overfitting, where the neural network model performs well on the training data but poorly on the test data. This means that the model has learned the noise and specific patterns of the training data, but cannot generalize to new and unseen data. To solve this issue, the Specialist should consider the following changes:

Choose a lower number of layers: Reducing the number of layers can reduce the complexity and capacity of the neural network model, making it less prone to overfitting. A model with 50 hidden layers is likely too deep for the given data size and task. A simpler model with fewer layers can learn the essential features of the data without memorizing the noise.

Enable dropout: Dropout is a regularization technique that randomly drops out some units in the neural network during training. This prevents the units from co-adapting too much and forces the model to learn more robust features. Dropout can improve the generalization and test performance of the model by reducing overfitting.

Enable early stopping: Early stopping is another regularization technique that monitors the validation error during training and stops the training process when the validation error stops decreasing or starts increasing. This prevents the model from overtraining on the training data and reduces overfitting.

References:

Deep Learning - Machine Learning Lens

How to Avoid Overfitting in Deep Learning Neural Networks

How to Identify Overfitting Machine Learning Models in Scikit-Learn

The solution D meets the requirements with the least operational overhead because it uses Amazon SageMaker Autopilot, which is a fully managed service that automates the end-to-end process of building, training, and deploying machine learning models. Amazon SageMaker Autopilot can handle data preprocessing, feature engineering, algorithm selection, hyperparameter tuning, and model deployment. The company only needs to create an IAM role for Amazon SageMaker with access to the S3 bucket, create a SageMaker AutoML job pointing to the bucket with the dataset, specify the price as the target attribute, and wait for the job to complete. Amazon SageMaker Autopilot will generate a list of candidate models with different configurations and performance metrics, and the company can deploy the best model for predictions1.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Creating a service-linked role for Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) with access to the S3 bucket, creating an ECS cluster based on an AWS Deep Learning Containers image, writing the code to perform the feature engineering, training a logistic regression model for predicting the price, and performing the inferences will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Autopilot. The company will have to manage the ECS cluster, the container image, the code, the model, and the inference endpoint. Moreover, logistic regression may not be the best algorithm for predicting the price, as it is more suitable for binary classification tasks2.

Option B: Creating an Amazon SageMaker notebook with a new IAM role that is associated with the notebook, pulling the dataset from the S3 bucket, exploring different combinations of feature engineering transformations, regression algorithms, and hyperparameters, comparing all the results in the notebook, and deploying the most accurate configuration in an endpoint for predictions will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Autopilot. The company will have to write the code for the feature engineering, the model training, the model evaluation, and the model deployment. The company will also have to manually compare the results and select the best configuration3.

Option C: Creating an IAM role with access to Amazon S3, Amazon SageMaker, and AWS Lambda, creating a training job with the SageMaker built-in XGBoost model pointing to the bucket with the dataset, specifying the price as the target feature, loading the model artifact to a Lambda function for inference on prices of new houses will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Autopilot. The company will have to create and manage the Lambda function, the model artifact, and the inference endpoint. Moreover, XGBoost may not be the best algorithm for predicting the price, as it is more suitable for classification and ranking tasks4.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Autopilot

2: Amazon Elastic Container Service

3: Amazon SageMaker Notebook Instances

4: Amazon SageMaker XGBoost Algorithm

A stratified k-fold cross-validation strategy is a technique that preserves the class distribution in each fold. This is important for imbalanced datasets, such as the one in the question, where the disease is seen in only 3% of the population. If a random k-fold cross-validation strategy is used, some folds may have no positive cases or very few, which would lead to poor estimates of the model performance. A stratified k-fold cross-validation strategy ensures that each fold has the same proportion of positive and negative cases as the whole dataset, which makes the evaluation more reliable and robust. A k-fold cross-validation strategy with k=5 and 3 repeats is also a possible option, but it is more computationally expensive and may not be necessary if the stratification is done properly. An 80/20 stratified split between training and validation is another option, but it uses less data for training and validation than k-fold cross-validation, which may result in higher variance and lower accuracy of the estimates. References:

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Certification Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Training: Model Evaluation

How to Fix k-Fold Cross-Validation for Imbalanced Classification

A sequential split is a method of splitting data into training and evaluation datasets while preserving the order of the data records. This method is useful when the data has a temporal or sequential structure, and the order of the data matters for the prediction task. For example, if the data contains sales data for different months or years, and the goal is to predict the sales for the next month or year, a sequential split can ensure that the training data comes from the earlier period and the evaluation data comes from the later period. This can help avoid data leakage, which occurs when the training data contains information from the future that is not available at the time of prediction. A sequential split can also help evaluate the model performance on the most recent data, which may be more relevant and representative of the future data.

In this question, Example Corp has sequential sales data from the past 15 years and wants to use Amazon ML to predict the sales for this year’s upcoming annual sale event. A sequential split is the most appropriate method for splitting the data, as it can preserve the order of the data and prevent data leakage. For example, Example Corp can use the data from the first 14 years as the training dataset, and the data from the last year as the evaluation dataset. This way, the model can learn from the historical data and be tested on the most recent data.

Amazon ML provides an option to split the data sequentially when creating the training and evaluation datasources. To use this option, Example Corp can specify the percentage of the data to use for training and evaluation, and Amazon ML will use the first part of the data for training and the remaining part of the data for evaluation. For more information, see Splitting Your Data - Amazon Machine Learning.

 The issue is that the notebook instances’ security group allows inbound traffic from any source IP address, which means that anyone with the authorized URL can access the notebook instances over the internet. To fix this issue, the data science team should modify the security group to allow traffic only from the CIDR ranges of the VPC, which are the IP addresses assigned to the resources within the VPC. This way, only the VPC interface endpoints and the resources within the VPC can communicate with the notebook instances. The data science team should apply this security group to all of the notebook instances’ VPC interfaces, which are the network interfaces that connect the notebook instances to the VPC.

The other options are not correct because:

Option B: Creating an IAM policy that allows the sagemaker:CreatePresignedNotebookInstanceUrl and sagemaker:DescribeNotebookInstance actions from only the VPC endpoints does not prevent individuals outside the VPC from accessing the notebook instances. These actions are used to generate and retrieve the authorized URL for the notebook instances, but they do not control who can use the URL to access the notebook instances. The URL can still be shared or leaked to unauthorized users, who can then access the notebook instances over the internet.

Option C: Adding a NAT gateway to the VPC and converting the subnets where the notebook instances are hosted to private subnets does not solve the issue either. A NAT gateway is used to enable outbound internet access from a private subnet, but it does not affect inbound internet access. The notebook instances can still be accessed over the internet if their security group allows inbound traffic from any source IP address. Moreover, stopping and starting the notebook instances to reassign only private IP addresses is not necessary, because the notebook instances already have private IP addresses assigned by the VPC interface endpoints.

Option D: Changing the network ACL of the subnet the notebook is hosted in to restrict access to anyone outside the VPC is not a good practice, because network ACLs are stateless and apply to the entire subnet. This means that the data science team would have to specify both the inbound and outbound rules for each IP address range that they want to allow or deny. This can be cumbersome and error-prone, especially if the VPC has multiple subnets and resources. It is better to use security groups, which are stateful and apply to individual resources, to control the access to the notebook instances.

References:

Connect to SageMaker Within your VPC - Amazon SageMaker

Security Groups for Your VPC - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

VPC Interface Endpoints - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

 Amazon Rekognition, Amazon Comprehend, and Amazon Transcribe are AWS machine learning services that can analyze and extract metadata from images, text, audio, and video content. These services are easy to use, scalable, and do not require any machine learning expertise. They can help the media company to quickly index its assets and enable rapid identification of relevant content by the research team. Using these services is the fastest route to index the assets, compared to the other options that involve human intervention, custom model development, or additional steps. References:

AWS Media Intelligence Solutions

AWS Machine Learning Services

The Best Services For Running Machine Learning Models On AWS

Data augmentation is a technique to increase the size and diversity of the training data by applying random transformations such as rotation, translation, scaling, flipping, etc. This can help reduce overfitting and improve the generalization of the model. Data augmentation can be done using the Amazon SageMaker image classification algorithm, which supports various augmentation options such as horizontal_flip, vertical_flip, rotate, brightness, contrast, etc1

The Amazon SageMaker k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) algorithm is a supervised learning algorithm that can be used to label unlabeled data based on the similarity to the labeled data. The k-NN algorithm assigns a label to an unlabeled instance by finding the k closest labeled instances in the feature space and taking a majority vote among their labels. This can help increase the size and diversity of the training data and reduce overfitting. The k-NN algorithm can be used with the Amazon SageMaker image classification algorithm by extracting features from the images using a pre-trained model and then applying the k-NN algorithm on the feature vectors2

Using Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to label the unlabeled images is not a good option because it is a manual and costly process that requires human annotators. Moreover, it does not address the issue of overfitting on the existing labeled data.

Using image preprocessing to transform the images into grayscale images is not a good option because it reduces the amount of information and variation in the images, which can degrade the performance of the model. Moreover, it does not address the issue of overfitting on the existing labeled data.

Replacing the activation of the last layer with a sigmoid is not a good option because it is not suitable for a multi-class classification problem. A sigmoid activation function outputs a value between 0 and 1, which can be interpreted as a probability of belonging to a single class. However, for a multi-class classification problem, the output should be a vector of probabilities that sum up to 1, which can be achieved by using a softmax activation function.

References:

1: Image classification algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

2: k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Based on the figure provided, the data is not linearly separable. Therefore, a non-linear model such as SVM with a non-linear kernel would be the best choice. SVMs are particularly effective in high-dimensional spaces and are versatile in that they can be used for both linear and non-linear data. Additionally, SVMs have a high level of accuracy and are less prone to overfitting1

References: 1: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/latest/dg/svm.html

The best technique to improve the recall of the MLP for the target class of interest is to add class weights to the MLP’s loss function and then retrain. Class weights are a way of assigning different importance to each class in the dataset, such that the model will pay more attention to the classes with higher weights. This can help mitigate the class imbalance problem, where the model tends to favor the majority class and ignore the minority class. By increasing the weight of the target class of interest, the model will try to reduce the false negatives and increase the true positives, which will improve the recall metric. Adding class weights to the loss function is also a quick and easy solution, as it does not require gathering more data, changing the model architecture, or switching to a different algorithm.

References:

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Training - Deep Learning with Amazon SageMaker

AWS Machine Learning Training - Class Imbalance and Weighted Loss Functions

Term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) is a technique that assigns a weight to each word in a document based on how important it is to the meaning of the document. The term frequency (TF) measures how often a word appears in a document, while the inverse document frequency (IDF) measures how rare a word is across a collection of documents. The TF-IDF weight is the product of the TF and IDF values, and it is high for words that are frequent in a specific document but rare in the overall corpus. TF-IDF can help improve the validation accuracy of a sentiment analysis model by reducing the impact of common words that have little or no sentiment value, such as “the”, “a”, “and”, etc. Scikit-learn is a popular Python library for machine learning that provides a TF-IDF vectorizer class that can transform a collection of text documents into a matrix of TF-IDF features. By using this tool, the Data Scientist can create a more informative and discriminative feature representation for the sentiment analysis task.

References:

TfidfVectorizer - scikit-learn

Text feature extraction - scikit-learn

TF-IDF for Beginners | by Jana Schmidt | Towards Data Science

Sentiment Analysis: Concept, Analysis and Applications | by Susan Li | Towards Data Science

 The simplest and fastest way to use the EFS dataset for SageMaker training is to run a SageMaker training job with an EFS file system as the data source. This option does not require any data copying or additional integration steps. SageMaker supports EFS as a data source for training jobs, and it can mount the EFS file system to the training container using the FileSystemConfig parameter. This way, the training script can access the data files as if they were on the local disk of the training instance. References:

Access Training Data - Amazon SageMaker

Mount an EFS file system to an Amazon SageMaker notebook (with lifecycle configurations) | AWS Machine Learning Blog

A VPC endpoint is a logical device that enables private connections between a VPC and supported AWS services. A VPC endpoint can be either a gateway endpoint or an interface endpoint. A gateway endpoint is a gateway that is a target for a specified route in the route table, used for traffic destined to a supported AWS service. An interface endpoint is an elastic network interface with a private IP address that serves as an entry point for traffic destined to a supported service1

In this case, the Machine Learning Specialist can create a gateway endpoint for Amazon S3, which is a supported service for gateway endpoints. A gateway endpoint for Amazon S3 enables the VPC to access Amazon S3 privately, without requiring an internet gateway, NAT device, VPN connection, or AWS Direct Connect connection. The traffic between the VPC and Amazon S3 does not leave the Amazon network2

To restrict access to the dataset stored in Amazon S3, the Machine Learning Specialist can apply a bucket access policy that allows access only from the given VPC endpoint and the VPC. A bucket access policy is a resource-based policy that defines who can access a bucket and what actions they can perform. A bucket access policy can use various conditions to control access, such as the source IP address, the source VPC, the source VPC endpoint, etc. In this case, the Machine Learning Specialist can use the aws:sourceVpce condition to specify the ID of the VPC endpoint, and the aws:sourceVpc condition to specify the ID of the VPC. This way, only the requests that originate from the VPC endpoint or the VPC can access the bucket that contains the dataset34

The other options are not valid or secure ways to satisfy the requirements. Creating a VPC endpoint and applying a bucket access policy that allows access from the given VPC endpoint and an Amazon EC2 instance is not a good option, as it does not restrict access to the VPC. An Amazon EC2 instance is a virtual server that runs in the AWS cloud. An Amazon EC2 instance can have a public IP address or a private IP address, depending on the network configuration. Allowing access from an Amazon EC2 instance does not guarantee that the instance is in the same VPC as the VPC endpoint, and may expose the dataset to unauthorized access. Creating a VPC endpoint and using Network Access Control Lists (NACLs) to allow traffic between only the given VPC endpoint and an Amazon EC2 instance is not a good option, as it does not restrict access to the VPC. NACLs are stateless firewalls that can control inbound and outbound traffic at the subnet level. NACLs can use rules to allow or deny traffic based on the protocol, port, and source or destination IP address. However, NACLs do not support VPC endpoints as a source or destination, and cannot filter traffic based on the VPC endpoint ID or the VPC ID. Therefore, using NACLs does not guarantee that the traffic is from the VPC endpoint or the VPC, and may expose the dataset to unauthorized access. Creating a VPC endpoint and using security groups to restrict access to the given VPC endpoint and an Amazon EC2 instance is not a good option, as it does not restrict access to the VPC. Security groups are stateful firewalls that can control inbound and outbound traffic at the instance level. Security groups can use rules to allow or deny traffic based on the protocol, port, and source or destination. However, security groups do not support VPC endpoints as a source or destination, and cannot filter traffic based on the VPC endpoint ID or the VPC ID. Therefore, using security groups does not guarantee that the traffic is from the VPC endpoint or the VPC, and may expose the dataset to unauthorized access.

 In this scenario, the specialist should use one-hot encoding and RGB encoding to allow the regression model to learn from the Wall_Color data. One-hot encoding is a technique used to convert categorical data into numerical data. It creates new columns that store one-hot representation of colors. For example, a variable named color has three categories: red, green, and blue. After one-hot encoding, the new variables should be like this:

One-hot encoding can capture the presence or absence of a color, but it cannot capture the intensity or hue of a color. RGB encoding is a technique used to represent colors in a digital image. It creates three columns to encode the color in RGB format. For example, a variable named color has three categories: red, green, and blue. After RGB encoding, the new variables should be like this:

RGB encoding can capture the intensity and hue of a color, but it may also introduce correlation among the three columns. Therefore, using both one-hot encoding and RGB encoding can provide more information to the regression model than using either one alone.

References:

Feature Engineering for Categorical Data

How to Perform Feature Selection with Categorical Data

 The solution A will meet the requirements with the most operational efficiency because it uses Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler, which is a service that simplifies the process of data preparation and feature engineering for machine learning. The solution A involves the following steps:

Use Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler preconfigured transformations to explore feature transformations. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler provides a visual interface that allows data scientists to apply various transformations to their tabular data, such as encoding categorical features, scaling numerical features, imputing missing values, and more. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler also supports custom transformations using Python code or SQL queries1.

Use SageMaker Data Wrangler templates for visualization. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler also provides a set of templates that can generate visualizations of the data, such as histograms, scatter plots, box plots, and more. These visualizations can help data scientists to understand the distribution and characteristics of the data, and to compare the effects of different feature transformations1.

Export the feature processing workflow to a SageMaker pipeline for automation. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler can export the feature processing workflow as a SageMaker pipeline, which is a service that orchestrates and automates machine learning workflows. A SageMaker pipeline can run the feature processing steps as a preprocessing step, and then feed the output to a training step or an inference step. This can reduce the operational overhead of managing the feature processing workflow and ensure its consistency and reproducibility2.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option B: Using an Amazon SageMaker notebook instance to experiment with different feature transformations, saving the transformations to Amazon S3, using Amazon QuickSight for visualization, and packaging the feature processing steps into an AWS Lambda function for automation will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. The data scientist will have to write the code for the feature transformations, the data storage, the data visualization, and the Lambda function. Moreover, AWS Lambda has limitations on the execution time, memory size, and package size, which may not be sufficient for complex feature processing tasks3.

Option C: Using AWS Glue Studio with custom code to experiment with different feature transformations, saving the transformations to Amazon S3, using Amazon QuickSight for visualization, and packaging the feature processing steps into an AWS Lambda function for automation will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. AWS Glue Studio is a visual interface that allows data engineers to create and run extract, transform, and load (ETL) jobs on AWS Glue. However, AWS Glue Studio does not provide preconfigured transformations or templates for feature engineering or data visualization. The data scientist will have to write custom code for these tasks, as well as for the Lambda function. Moreover, AWS Glue Studio is not integrated with SageMaker pipelines, and it may not be optimized for machine learning workflows4.

Option D: Using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler preconfigured transformations to experiment with different feature transformations, saving the transformations to Amazon S3, using Amazon QuickSight for visualization, packaging each feature transformation step into a separate AWS Lambda function, and using AWS Step Functions for workflow automation will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. The data scientist will have to create and manage multiple AWS Lambda functions and AWS Step Functions, which can increase the complexity and cost of the solution. Moreover, AWS Lambda and AWS Step Functions may not be compatible with SageMaker pipelines, and they may not be optimized for machine learning workflows5.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler

2: Amazon SageMaker Pipelines

3: AWS Lambda

4: AWS Glue Studio

5: AWS Step Functions

The best solution for text extraction and entity detection with the least amount of effort is to use Amazon Textract and Amazon Comprehend. These services are:

Amazon Textract for text extraction from receipt images. Amazon Textract is a machine learning service that can automatically extract text and data from scanned documents. It can handle different structures and formats of documents, such as PDF, TIFF, PNG, and JPEG, without any preprocessing steps. It can also extract key-value pairs and tables from documents1

Amazon Comprehend for entity detection and custom entity detection. Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing service that can identify entities, such as dates, locations, and notes, from unstructured text. It can also detect custom entities, such as receipt numbers, by using a custom entity recognizer that can be trained with a small amount of labeled data2

The other options are not suitable because they either require more effort for text extraction, entity detection, or custom entity detection. For example:

Option A uses the Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm to train on the text for entities and custom entities. BlazingText is a supervised learning algorithm that can perform text classification and word2vec. It requires users to provide a large amount of labeled data, preprocess the data into a specific format, and tune the hyperparameters of the model3

Option B uses a deep learning OCR model from the AWS Marketplace and a NER deep learning model for text extraction and entity detection. These models are pre-trained and may not be suitable for the specific use case of receipt processing. They also require users to deploy and manage the models on Amazon SageMaker or Amazon EC2 instances4

Option D uses a deep learning OCR model from the AWS Marketplace for text extraction. This model has the same drawbacks as option B. It also requires users to integrate the model output with Amazon Comprehend for entity detection and custom entity detection.

References:

1: Amazon Textract – Extract text and data from documents

2: Amazon Comprehend – Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML)

3: BlazingText - Amazon SageMaker

4: AWS Marketplace: OCR

The problem described in the question is a case of underfitting, where the neural network model performs poorly on both the training and validation sets. This means that the model has not learned the features of the data well enough and has high bias. To solve this issue, the machine learning specialist should consider the following change:

Add more data to the training set and retrain the model using transfer learning to reduce the bias: Adding more data to the training set can help the model learn more patterns and variations in the data and improve its performance. Transfer learning can also help the model leverage the knowledge from the pre-trained network and adapt it to the new data. This can reduce the bias and increase the accuracy of the model.

References:

Transfer learning for TensorFlow image classification models in Amazon SageMaker

Transfer learning for custom labels using a TensorFlow container and “bring your own algorithm” in Amazon SageMaker

Machine Learning Concepts - AWS Training and Certification

The data sources that the data scientist should use to augment the dataset of reviews are those that contain relevant and diverse customer feedback about the company or its products. Emails exchanged by customers and the company’s customer service agents can provide valuable insights into the issues and complaints that customers have, as well as the solutions and responses that the company offers. Social media posts containing the name of the company or its products can capture the opinions and sentiments of customers and potential customers, as well as their reactions to marketing campaigns and product launches. A publicly available collection of customer reviews can provide a large and varied sample of feedback from different online platforms and marketplaces, which can help to generalize the ML models and avoid bias.

References:

Detect sentiment from customer reviews using Amazon Comprehend | AWS Machine Learning Blog

How to Apply Machine Learning to Customer Feedback

 To improve the training speed of a time-series forecasting model using TensorFlow, the Machine Learning Specialist should change the TensorFlow code to implement a Horovod distributed framework supported by Amazon SageMaker. Horovod is a free and open-source software framework for distributed deep learning training using TensorFlow, Keras, PyTorch, and Apache MXNet1. Horovod can scale up to hundreds of GPUs with upwards of 90% scaling efficiency2. Horovod is easy to use, as it requires only a few lines of Python code to modify an existing training script2. Horovod is also portable, as it runs the same for TensorFlow, Keras, PyTorch, and MXNet; on premise, in the cloud, and on Apache Spark2.

Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that provides every developer and data scientist with the ability to build, train, and deploy machine learning models quickly3. Amazon SageMaker supports Horovod as a built-in distributed training framework, which means that the Machine Learning Specialist does not need to install or configure Horovod separately4. Amazon SageMaker also provides a number of features and tools to simplify and optimize the distributed training process, such as automatic scaling, debugging, profiling, and monitoring4. By using Amazon SageMaker, the Machine Learning Specialist can parallelize the training to as many machines as needed to achieve the business goals, while minimizing coding effort and infrastructure changes.

References:

1: Horovod (machine learning) - Wikipedia

2: Home - Horovod

3: Amazon SageMaker – Machine Learning Service – AWS

4: Use Horovod with Amazon SageMaker - Amazon SageMaker

 The best combination of AWS services to meet the requirements of data discovery, enrichment, transformation, querying, analysis, and reporting with the least coding and infrastructure management is AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, and Amazon QuickSight. These services are:

AWS Glue for data discovery, enrichment, and transformation. AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that automatically crawls, catalogs, and prepares data from various sources and formats. It also provides a visual interface called AWS Glue DataBrew that allows users to apply over 250 transformations to clean, normalize, and enrich data without writing code1

Amazon Athena for querying and analyzing the results in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows users to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. It supports a variety of data formats, such as CSV, JSON, ORC, Parquet, and Avro. It also integrates with AWS Glue Data Catalog to provide a unified view of the data sources and schemas2

Amazon QuickSight for reporting and getting insights. Amazon QuickSight is a serverless business intelligence service that allows users to create and share interactive dashboards and reports. It also provides ML-powered features, such as anomaly detection, forecasting, and natural language queries, to help users discover hidden insights from their data3

The other options are not suitable because they either require more coding effort, more infrastructure management, or do not support the desired use cases. For example:

Option A uses Amazon EMR for data discovery, enrichment, and transformation. Amazon EMR is a managed cluster platform that runs Apache Spark, Apache Hive, and other open-source frameworks for big data processing. It requires users to write code in languages such as Python, Scala, or SQL to perform data integration tasks. It also requires users to provision, configure, and scale the clusters according to their needs4

Option B uses Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics for data ingestion. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that allows users to process streaming data in real time using SQL or Apache Flink. It is not suitable for data discovery, enrichment, and transformation, which are typically batch-oriented tasks. It also requires users to write code to define the data processing logic and the output destination5

Option D uses AWS Data Pipeline for data transfer and AWS Step Functions for orchestrating AWS Lambda jobs for data discovery, enrichment, and transformation. AWS Data Pipeline is a service that helps users move data between AWS services and on-premises data sources. AWS Step Functions is a service that helps users coordinate multiple AWS services into workflows. AWS Lambda is a service that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. These services require users to write code to define the data sources, destinations, transformations, and workflows. They also require users to manage the scalability, performance, and reliability of the data pipelines.

References:

1: AWS Glue - Data Integration Service - Amazon Web Services

2: Amazon Athena – Interactive SQL Query Service - AWS

3: Amazon QuickSight - Business Intelligence Service - AWS

4: Amazon EMR - Amazon Web Services

5: Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics - Amazon Web Services

: AWS Data Pipeline - Amazon Web Services

: AWS Step Functions - Amazon Web Services

: AWS Lambda - Amazon Web Services

When forecasting sales data, missing values can significantly impact model accuracy, especially for time series models. Approximately 10% of the days in this dataset lack sales data, which may cause gaps in patterns and disrupt seasonal trends. Linear interpolation is an effective technique for estimating and filling in missing data points based on adjacent known values, thus preserving the continuity of the time series.

By interpolating the missing values, the ML specialist can provide the model with a more complete and consistent dataset, potentially enhancing performance. This approach maintains the daily data granularity, which is important for accurately capturing trends at that frequency.

The solution C will improve the computational efficiency of the models because it uses Amazon SageMaker Debugger and pruning, which are techniques that can reduce the size and complexity of the convolutional neural network (CNN) models. The solution C involves the following steps:

Use Amazon SageMaker Debugger to gain visibility into the training weights, gradients, biases, and activation outputs. Amazon SageMaker Debugger is a service that can capture and analyze the tensors that are emitted during the training process of machine learning models. Amazon SageMaker Debugger can provide insights into the model performance, quality, and convergence. Amazon SageMaker Debugger can also help to identify and diagnose issues such as overfitting, underfitting, vanishing gradients, and exploding gradients1.

Compute the filter ranks based on the training information. Filter ranking is a technique that can measure the importance of each filter in a convolutional layer based on some criterion, such as the average percentage of zero activations or the L1-norm of the filter weights. Filter ranking can help to identify the filters that have little or no contribution to the model output, and thus can be removed without affecting the model accuracy2.

Apply pruning to remove the low-ranking filters. Pruning is a technique that can reduce the size and complexity of a neural network by removing the redundant or irrelevant parts of the network, such as neurons, connections, or filters. Pruning can help to improve the computational efficiency, memory usage, and inference speed of the model, as well as to prevent overfitting and improve generalization3.

Set the new weights based on the pruned set of filters. After pruning, the model will have a smaller and simpler architecture, with fewer filters in each convolutional layer. The new weights of the model can be set based on the pruned set of filters, either by initializing them randomly or by fine-tuning them from the original weights4.

Run a new training job with the pruned model. The pruned model can be trained again with the same or a different dataset, using the same or a different framework or algorithm. The new training job can use the same or a different configuration of Amazon SageMaker, such as the instance type, the hyperparameters, or the data ingestion mode. The new training job can also use Amazon SageMaker Debugger to monitor and analyze the training process and the model quality5.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Using Amazon CloudWatch metrics to gain visibility into the SageMaker training weights, gradients, biases, and activation outputs will not be as effective as using Amazon SageMaker Debugger. Amazon CloudWatch is a service that can monitor and observe the operational health and performance of AWS resources and applications. Amazon CloudWatch can provide metrics, alarms, dashboards, and logs for various AWS services, including Amazon SageMaker. However, Amazon CloudWatch does not provide the same level of granularity and detail as Amazon SageMaker Debugger for the tensors that are emitted during the training process of machine learning models. Amazon CloudWatch metrics are mainly focused on the resource utilization and the training progress, not on the model performance, quality, and convergence6.

Option B: Using Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to build and run data labeling workflows and collecting a larger labeled dataset with the labeling workflows will not improve the computational efficiency of the models. Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth is a service that can create high-quality training datasets for machine learning by using human labelers. A larger labeled dataset can help to improve the model accuracy and generalization, but it will not reduce the memory, battery, and hardware consumption of the model. Moreover, a larger labeled dataset may increase the training time and cost of the model7.

Option D: Using Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor to gain visibility into the ModelLatency metric and OverheadLatency metric of the model after the company deploys the model and increasing the model learning rate will not improve the computational efficiency of the models. Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor is a service that can monitor and analyze the quality and performance of machine learning models that are deployed on Amazon SageMaker endpoints. The ModelLatency metric and the OverheadLatency metric can measure the inference latency of the model and the endpoint, respectively. However, these metrics do not provide any information about the training weights, gradients, biases, and activation outputs of the model, which are needed for pruning. Moreover, increasing the model learning rate will not reduce the size and complexity of the model, but it may affect the model convergence and accuracy.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Debugger

2: Pruning Convolutional Neural Networks for Resource Efficient Inference

3: Pruning Neural Networks: A Survey

4: Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks

5: Amazon SageMaker Training Jobs

6: Amazon CloudWatch Metrics for Amazon SageMaker

7: Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth

: Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor

A Comprehensive Explanation: The best way to split the dataset into a training dataset and a validation dataset is to pick a date so that 80% of the data points precede the date and assign that group of data points as the training dataset. This method preserves the temporal order of the data and ensures that the validation dataset reflects the most recent trends and patterns in the commodity price. This is important for forecasting models that rely on time series analysis and sequential data. The other methods would either introduce bias or lose information by ignoring the temporal structure of the data.

References:

Time Series Forecasting - Amazon SageMaker

Time Series Splitting - scikit-learn

Time Series Forecasting - Towards Data Science

The best way to maintain the privacy and integrity of the data stored in Amazon S3 is to use a combination of VPC endpoints and S3 bucket policies. A VPC endpoint allows the SageMaker notebook instance to access the S3 bucket without going through the public internet. A bucket policy allows the S3 bucket owner to specify which VPCs or VPC endpoints can access the bucket. This way, the data is protected from unauthorized access and tampering. The other options are either insecure (A and D) or inefficient (B). References: Using Amazon S3 VPC Endpoints, Using Bucket Policies and User Policies

Word embeddings are a type of dense representation of words, which encode semantic meaning in a vector form. These embeddings are typically pre-trained on a large corpus of text data, such as a large set of books, news articles, or web pages, and capture the context in which words are used. Word embeddings can be used as features for a nearest neighbor model, which can be used to find words used in similar contexts. Downloading pre-trained word embeddings is a good way to get started quickly and leverage the strengths of these representations, which have been optimized on a large amount of data. This is likely to result in more accurate and reliable features than other options like one-hot encoding, edit distance, or using Amazon Mechanical Turk to produce synonyms.

The AnalyzeDocument API action is the best option to generate a confidence score for each page of each contract. This API action analyzes an input document for relationships between detected items. The input document can be an image file in JPEG or PNG format, or a PDF file. The output is a JSON structure that contains the extracted data from the document. The FeatureTypes parameter specifies the types of analysis to perform on the document. The available feature types are TABLES, FORMS, and SIGNATURES. By setting the FeatureTypes parameter to SIGNATURES, the API action will detect and extract information about signatures from the document. The output will include a list of SignatureDetection objects, each containing information about a detected signature, such as its location and confidence score. The confidence score is a value between 0 and 100 that indicates the probability that the detected signature is correct. The output will also include a list of Block objects, each representing a document page. Each Block object will have a Page attribute that contains the page number and a Confidence attribute that contains the confidence score for the page. The confidence score for the page is the average of the confidence scores of the blocks that are detected on the page. The law firm can use the AnalyzeDocument API action to generate a confidence score for each page of each contract by using the SIGNATURES feature type and returning the confidence scores from the SignatureDetection and Block objects.

The other options are not suitable for generating a confidence score for each page of each contract. The Prediction API call is not an Amazon Textract API action, but a generic term for making inference requests to a machine learning model. The StartDocumentAnalysis API action is used to start an asynchronous job to analyze a document. The output is a job identifier (JobId) that is used to get the results of the analysis with the GetDocumentAnalysis API action. The GetDocumentAnalysis API action is used to get the results of a document analysis started by the StartDocumentAnalysis API action. The output is a JSON structure that contains the extracted data from the document. However, both the StartDocumentAnalysis and the GetDocumentAnalysis API actions do not support the SIGNATURES feature type, and therefore cannot detect signatures or provide confidence scores for them.

References:

•AnalyzeDocument

•SignatureDetection

•Block

•Amazon Textract launches the ability to detect signatures on any document

Feature selection is the process of reducing the number of input variables to those that are most relevant for predicting the target variable. One way to do this is to run a correlation check of all features against the target variable and remove features with low target variable correlation scores. This means that these features have little or no linear relationship with the target variable and are not useful for the prediction. This can reduce the model’s complexity and improve its performance. References:

Feature engineering - Machine Learning Lens

Feature Selection For Machine Learning in Python

The goal of classification is to determine to which class or category a data point (customer in our case) belongs to. For classification problems, data scientists would use historical data with predefined target variables AKA labels (churner/non-churner) – answers that need to be predicted – to train an algorithm. With classification, businesses can answer the following questions:

Will this customer churn or not?

Will a customer renew their subscription?

Will a user downgrade a pricing plan?

Are there any signs of unusual customer behavior?

 The solution that will meet the requirements with the least development time is to use Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to stream the reservation data directly to Amazon S3, detect high-demand outliers by using Amazon QuickSight ML Insights, and visualize the data in QuickSight. This solution does not require any custom development or ML domain expertise, as it leverages the built-in features of QuickSight ML Insights to automatically run anomaly detection and generate insights on the streaming data. QuickSight ML Insights can also create a visualization dashboard that automatically refreshes with the most recent data, and allows the data scientist to explore the outliers and their key drivers. References:

1: Simplify and automate anomaly detection in streaming data with Amazon Lookout for Metrics | AWS Machine Learning Blog

2: Detecting outliers with ML-powered anomaly detection - Amazon QuickSight

3: Real-time Outlier Detection Over Streaming Data - IEEE Xplore

4: Towards a deep learning-based outlier detection … - Journal of Big Data

In cases where survey questions allow multiple choices per question, one-hot encoding is an effective way to represent responses as binary features. Each possible option for each question is transformed into a separate binary column (1 if selected, 0 if not), providing a comprehensive and machine-readable format that logistic regression models can interpret effectively.

This approach ensures that each respondent’s selections are accurately captured in a format suitable for training, offering a straightforward representation for multi-choice responses.

 A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier is a suitable architecture for image classification tasks, as it can learn features from the images and reduce the dimensionality of the input. A linear output layer that outputs the probability that an image contains a car is appropriate for a binary classification problem, as it can produce a single scalar value between 0 and 1. A softmax output layer is more suitable for a multi-class classification problem, as it can produce a vector of probabilities that sum up to 1. A deep multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier is not as effective as a CNN for image classification, as it does not exploit the spatial structure of the images and requires a large number of parameters to process the high-dimensional input. References:

AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Training - Machine Learning on AWS

AWS Whitepaper - An Overview of Machine Learning on AWS

Applying L1 regularization encourages sparsity by penalizing weights directly, often driving many weights to zero. In this case, the ML specialist observes that all weights become zero, which suggests that the L1 regularization parameter is set too high. This high value overly penalizes non-zero weights, effectively removing all features from the model.

To improve the model, the ML specialist should reduce the L1 regularization parameter, allowing some features to retain non-zero weights. This adjustment will make the model less prone to excessive sparsity, allowing it to better capture essential patterns in the data without dropping all features. Introducing L2 regularization is another approach but may not directly resolve this specific issue of all-zero weights as effectively as reducing L1.

The best way to handle the missing values in the patient age feature is to replace them with the mean or median value from the dataset. This is a common technique for imputing missing values that preserves the overall distribution of the data and avoids introducing bias or reducing the sample size. Dropping the records or the feature would result in losing valuable information and reducing the accuracy of the model. Using k-means clustering would not be appropriate for handling missing values in a single feature, as it is a method for grouping similar data points based on multiple features.

References:

Effective Strategies to Handle Missing Values in Data Analysis

How To Handle Missing Values In Machine Learning Data With Weka

How to handle missing values in Python - Machine Learning Plus

 The best strategy to identify fraudulent accounts is to create a FindMatches machine learning transform in AWS Glue. The FindMatches transform enables you to identify duplicate or matching records in your dataset, even when the records do not have a common unique identifier and no fields match exactly. This can help you improve fraud detection by finding accounts that are associated with a previously known fraudulent user. You can teach the FindMatches transform your definition of a “duplicate” or a “match” through examples, and it will use machine learning to identify other potential duplicates or matches in your dataset. You can then use the FindMatches transform in your AWS Glue ETL jobs to cleanse your data.

Option A is incorrect because there is no built-in FindDuplicates Amazon Athena query. Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. However, Amazon Athena does not provide a predefined query to find duplicate records in a dataset. You would have to write your own SQL query to perform this task, which might not be as effective or accurate as using the FindMatches transform.

Option C is incorrect because creating an AWS Glue crawler to infer duplicate accounts in the source data is not a valid strategy. An AWS Glue crawler is a program that connects to a data store, progresses through a prioritized list of classifiers to determine the schema for your data, and then creates metadata tables in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. A crawler does not perform any data cleansing or record matching tasks.

Option D is incorrect because searching for duplicate accounts in the AWS Glue Data Catalog is not a feasible strategy. The AWS Glue Data Catalog is a central repository to store structural and operational metadata for your data assets. The Data Catalog does not store the actual data, but rather the metadata that describes where the data is located, how it is formatted, and what it contains. Therefore, you cannot search for duplicate records in the Data Catalog.

References:

Record matching with AWS Lake Formation FindMatches - AWS Glue

Amazon Athena – Interactive SQL Queries for Data in Amazon S3

AWS Glue Crawlers - AWS Glue

AWS Glue Data Catalog - AWS Glue

The best way to retrain the model to meet the requirements is to set the target_recall hyperparameter to 90% and set the binary_classifier_model_selection_criteria hyperparameter to recall_at_target_precision. This will instruct the linear learner algorithm to optimize the model for a high recall score, while maintaining a reasonable precision score. Recall is the proportion of actual positives that were identified correctly, which is important for the company’s goal of reaching at least 90% of the customers who are likely to buy the new product1. Precision is the proportion of positive identifications that were actually correct, which is also relevant for the company’s budget and efficiency2. By setting the target_recall to 90%, the algorithm will try to achieve a recall score of at least 90%, and by setting the binary_classifier_model_selection_criteria to recall_at_target_precision, the algorithm will select the model that has the highest recall score among those that have a precision score equal to or higher than the target precision3. The target precision is automatically set to the median of the precision scores of all the models trained in parallel4.

The other options are not correct or optimal, because they have the following drawbacks:

B: Setting the target_precision hyperparameter to 90% and setting the binary_classifier_model_selection_criteria hyperparameter to precision_at_target_recall will optimize the model for a high precision score, while maintaining a reasonable recall score. However, this is not aligned with the company’s goal of reaching at least 90% of the customers who are likely to buy the new product, as precision does not reflect how well the model identifies the actual positives1. Moreover, setting the target_precision to 90% might be too high and unrealistic for the dataset, as the current precision score is only 75%4.

C: Using 90% of the historical data for training and setting the number of epochs to 20 will not necessarily improve the recall score of the model, as it does not change the optimization objective or the model selection criteria. Moreover, using more data for training might reduce the amount of data available for validation, which is needed for selecting the best model among the ones trained in parallel3. The number of epochs is also not a decisive factor for the recall score, as it depends on the learning rate, the optimizer, and the convergence of the algorithm5.

D: Setting the normalize_label hyperparameter to true and setting the number of classes to 2 will not affect the recall score of the model, as these are irrelevant hyperparameters for binary classification problems. The normalize_label hyperparameter is only applicable for regression problems, as it controls whether the label is normalized to have zero mean and unit variance3. The number of classes hyperparameter is only applicable for multiclass classification problems, as it specifies the number of output classes3.

References:

1: Classification: Precision and Recall | Machine Learning | Google for Developers

2: Precision and recall - Wikipedia

3: Linear Learner Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

4: How linear learner works - Amazon SageMaker

5: Getting hands-on with Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner - Pluralsight

To build a robust serverless data lake on Amazon S3 that meets the requirements, the financial services company should use the following AWS services:

AWS Glue crawler: This is a service that connects to a data store, progresses through a prioritized list of classifiers to determine the schema for the data, and then creates metadata tables in the AWS Glue Data Catalog1. The company can use an AWS Glue crawler to crawl the S3 data and infer the schema, format, and partition structure of the data. The crawler can also detect schema changes and update the metadata tables accordingly. This enables the company to support querying old and new data on Amazon S3 through Amazon Athena and Amazon Redshift Spectrum, which are serverless interactive query services that use the AWS Glue Data Catalog as a central location for storing and retrieving table metadata23.

AWS Lambda function: This is a service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You pay only for the compute time you consume - there is no charge when your code is not running. You can also use AWS Lambda to create event-driven ETL pipelines, by triggering other AWS services based on events such as object creation or deletion in S3 buckets4. The company can use an AWS Lambda function to trigger an AWS Glue ETL job, which is a serverless way to extract, transform, and load data for analytics. The AWS Glue ETL job can perform various data processing tasks, such as converting data formats, filtering, aggregating, joining, and more.

AWS Glue Data Catalog: This is a managed service that acts as a central metadata repository for data assets across AWS and on-premises data sources. The AWS Glue Data Catalog provides a uniform repository where disparate systems can store and find metadata to keep track of data in data silos, and use that metadata to query and transform the data. The company can use the AWS Glue Data Catalog to search and discover metadata, such as table definitions, schemas, and partitions. The AWS Glue Data Catalog also integrates with Amazon Athena, Amazon Redshift Spectrum, Amazon EMR, and AWS Glue ETL jobs, providing a consistent view of the data across different query and analysis services.

References:

1: What Is a Crawler? - AWS Glue

2: What Is Amazon Athena? - Amazon Athena

3: Amazon Redshift Spectrum - Amazon Redshift

4: What is AWS Lambda? - AWS Lambda

: AWS Glue ETL Jobs - AWS Glue

: What Is the AWS Glue Data Catalog? - AWS Glue

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that can catalogue, clean, enrich, and move data between various data stores. Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that can run SQL queries on data stored in Amazon S3. By using AWS Glue to catalogue the data and Amazon Athena to run queries, the Machine Learning Specialist can leverage the existing data in Amazon S3 without any additional data transformation or loading. This solution requires the least effort compared to the other options, which involve more complex and costly data processing and storage services. References: AWS Glue, Amazon Athena

To prepare and transform historical data efficiently with minimal setup, Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler is the optimal tool. Data Wrangler simplifies data preprocessing and exploratory data analysis (EDA) by providing a graphical interface for transformations and insights. By first uploading the CSV data to Amazon S3, the data becomes easily accessible to SageMaker and can be imported directly into Data Wrangler.

Once in Data Wrangler, the team can perform required data transformations and generate insights in a single workflow, avoiding the need for additional tools like Amazon QuickSight or further notebook configuration. This approach provides the simplest and most integrated solution for the data science team.

 Based on the model evaluation results, this is a viable model for production because the model is 86% accurate and the cost incurred by the company as a result of false positives is less than the false negatives. The accuracy of the model is the proportion of correct predictions out of the total predictions, which can be calculated by adding the true positives and true negatives and dividing by the total number of observations. In this case, the accuracy of the model is (10 + 76) / 100 = 0.86, which means that the model correctly predicted 86% of the customers’ churn status. The cost incurred by the company as a result of false positives and false negatives is the loss or damage that the company suffers when the model makes incorrect predictions. A false positive is when the model predicts that a customer will churn, but the customer actually does not churn. A false negative is when the model predicts that a customer will not churn, but the customer actually churns. In this case, the cost of a false positive is the incentive that the company offers to the customer who is predicted to churn, which is a relatively low cost. The cost of a false negative is the revenue that the company loses when the customer churns, which is a relatively high cost. Therefore, the cost of a false positive is less than the cost of a false negative, and the company would prefer to have more false positives than false negatives. The model has 10 false positives and 4 false negatives, which means that the company’s cost is lower than if the model had more false negatives and fewer false positives.

The solution that the data scientist should use to improve the performance of the model is to apply the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) on the minority class in the training dataset, and retrain the model with the updated training data. This solution can address the problem of class imbalance in the dataset, which can affect the model’s ability to learn from the rare but important positive class (fraud).

Class imbalance is a common issue in machine learning, especially for classification tasks. It occurs when one class (usually the positive or target class) is significantly underrepresented in the dataset compared to the other class (usually the negative or non-target class). For example, in the credit card fraud detection problem, the positive class (fraud) is much less frequent than the negative class (fair transactions). This can cause the model to be biased towards the majority class, and fail to capture the characteristics and patterns of the minority class. As a result, the model may have a high overall accuracy, but a low recall or true positive rate for the minority class, which means it misses many fraudulent transactions.

SMOTE is a technique that can help mitigate the class imbalance problem by generating synthetic samples for the minority class. SMOTE works by finding the k-nearest neighbors of each minority class instance, and randomly creating new instances along the line segments connecting them. This way, SMOTE can increase the number and diversity of the minority class instances, without duplicating or losing any information. By applying SMOTE on the minority class in the training dataset, the data scientist can balance the classes and improve the model’s performance on the positive class1.

The other options are either ineffective or counterproductive. Applying SMOTE on the majority class would not balance the classes, but increase the imbalance and the size of the dataset. Undersampling the minority class would reduce the number of instances available for the model to learn from, and potentially lose some important information. Oversampling the majority class would also increase the imbalance and the size of the dataset, and introduce redundancy and overfitting.

References:

1: SMOTE for Imbalanced Classification with Python - Machine Learning Mastery

The best Amazon SageMaker algorithm for this task is Image Classification - TensorFlow. This algorithm is a supervised learning algorithm that supports transfer learning with many pretrained models from the TensorFlow Hub. Transfer learning allows the company to fine-tune one of the available pretrained models on their own dataset, even if a large amount of image data is not available. The image classification algorithm takes an image as input and outputs a probability for each provided class label. The company can choose from a variety of models, such as MobileNet, ResNet, or Inception, depending on their accuracy and speed requirements. The algorithm also supports distributed training, data augmentation, and hyperparameter tuning.

References:

Image Classification - TensorFlow - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon SageMaker Provides New Built-in TensorFlow Image Classification Algorithm

Image Classification with ResNet :: Amazon SageMaker Workshop

Image classification on Amazon SageMaker | by Julien Simon - Medium

In this scenario, the company requires that access to the Amazon SageMaker notebook remain within the AWS internal network, avoiding the public internet. By creating a VPC interface endpoint for SageMaker, the company can ensure that traffic to the SageMaker notebook remains internal to the VPC and is accessible over a private connection. The VPC interface endpoint allows private network access to AWS services, and it operates over AWS’s internal network, respecting the security and connectivity policies the company requires.

This solution requires minimal development effort compared to options involving bastion hosts or NAT gateways, as it directly provides private network access to the SageMaker notebook.

Regularization is a technique that can be used to prevent overfitting and improve model performance on unseen data. Overfitting occurs when the model learns the training data too well and fails to generalize to new and unseen data. This can be seen in the question, where the validation accuracy is lower than the training accuracy, and both are lower than the human-level performance. Regularization is a way of adding some constraints or penalties to the model to reduce its complexity and prevent it from memorizing the training data. Some common forms of regularization for image classification are:

Weight decay: Adding a term to the loss function that penalizes large weights in the model. This can help reduce the variance and noise in the model and make it more robust to small changes in the input.

Dropout: Randomly dropping out some units or connections in the model during training. This can help reduce the co-dependency among the units and make the model more resilient to missing or corrupted features.

Data augmentation: Artificially increasing the size and diversity of the training data by applying random transformations, such as cropping, flipping, rotating, scaling, etc. This can help the model learn more invariant and generalizable features and reduce the risk of overfitting to specific patterns in the training data.

The other options are not likely to fix the issue of overfitting, and may even worsen it:

A longer training time: This can lead to more overfitting, as the model will have more chances to fit the noise and details in the training data that are not relevant for the validation data.

Making the network larger: This can increase the model capacity and complexity, which can also lead to more overfitting, as the model will have more parameters to learn and adjust to the training data.

Using a different optimizer: This can affect the speed and stability of the training process, but not necessarily the generalization ability of the model. The choice of optimizer depends on the characteristics of the data and the model, and there is no guarantee that a different optimizer will prevent overfitting.

References:

Regularization (machine learning)

Image Classification: Regularization

How to Reduce Overfitting With Dropout Regularization in Keras

The best solution for this scenario is to use Amazon Kinesis Data Streams to export the data from Amazon DynamoDB to Amazon S3, and then configure QuickSight to access the data in Amazon S3. This solution has the following advantages:

It allows near real-time data ingestion from DynamoDB to S3 using Kinesis Data Streams, which can capture and process data continuously and at scale1.

It enables QuickSight to access the data in S3 using the Athena connector, which supports federated queries to multiple data sources, including Kinesis Data Streams2.

It avoids the need to create and manage a Lambda function or a Glue crawler, which are required for the other solutions.

The other solutions have the following drawbacks:

Using AWS Glue to export the data from DynamoDB to S3 introduces additional latency and complexity, as Glue is a batch-oriented service that requires scheduling and configuration3.

Using an API call from QuickSight to access the data in DynamoDB directly is not possible, as QuickSight does not support direct querying of DynamoDB4.

Using Kinesis Data Firehose to export the data from DynamoDB to S3 is less efficient and flexible than using Kinesis Data Streams, as Firehose does not support custom data processing or transformation, and has a minimum buffer interval of 60 seconds5.

References:

1: Amazon Kinesis Data Streams - Amazon Web Services

2: Visualize Amazon DynamoDB insights in Amazon QuickSight using the Amazon Athena DynamoDB connector and AWS Glue | AWS Big Data Blog

3: AWS Glue - Amazon Web Services

4: Visualising your Amazon DynamoDB data with Amazon QuickSight - DEV Community

5: Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose - Amazon Web Services

 Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) is a metric that measures the performance of a binary classifier across all possible thresholds. It is also known as the probability that a randomly chosen positive example will be ranked higher than a randomly chosen negative example by the classifier. AUC is a good metric to compare different classification models because it is independent of the class distribution and the decision threshold. It also captures both the sensitivity (true positive rate) and the specificity (true negative rate) of the model. References:

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Sample Questions

Explanation: Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that allows you to analyze data stored in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so you only pay for the queries that you run and there is no infrastructure to manage.

To optimize the query performance of Athena, one of the best practices is to convert the data into a columnar format, such as Apache Parquet or Apache ORC. Columnar formats store data by columns rather than by rows, which allows Athena to scan only the columns that are relevant to the query, reducing the amount of data read and improving the query speed. Columnar formats also support compression and encoding schemes that can reduce the storage space and the data scanned per query, further enhancing the performance and reducing the cost.

In contrast, plaintext CSV files store data by rows, which means that Athena has to scan the entire row even if only a few columns are needed for the query. This increases the amount of data read and the query latency. Moreover, plaintext CSV files do not support compression or encoding, which means that they take up more storage space and incur higher query costs.

Therefore, the Machine Learning Specialist should transform the dataset to Apache Parquet format to minimize query runtime.

References:

Top 10 Performance Tuning Tips for Amazon Athena

Columnar Storage Formats

Using compressions will reduce the amount of data scanned by Amazon Athena, and also reduce your S3 bucket storage. It’s a Win-Win for your AWS bill. Supported formats: GZIP, LZO, SNAPPY (Parquet) and ZLIB.

The data scientist should use K-means and principal component analysis (PCA) to meet this requirement. K-means is a clustering algorithm that can group customers based on their similarity in the feature space. PCA is a dimensionality reduction technique that can transform the original 980 variables into a smaller set of uncorrelated variables that capture most of the variance in the data. This can help reduce the computational cost and noise in the data, and improve the performance of the clustering algorithm.

References:

Clustering - Amazon SageMaker

Dimensionality Reduction - Amazon SageMaker

Using log-scaled hyperparameters is a guideline that can improve the automatic model tuning in Amazon SageMaker. Log-scaled hyperparameters are hyperparameters that have values that span several orders of magnitude, such as learning rate, regularization parameter, or number of hidden units. Log-scaled hyperparameters can be specified by using a log-uniform distribution, which assigns equal probability to each order of magnitude within a range. For example, a log-uniform distribution between 0.001 and 1000 can sample values such as 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, or 1000 with equal probability. Using log-scaled hyperparameters can allow the hyperparameter optimization feature to search the hyperparameter space more efficiently and effectively, as it can explore different scales of values and avoid sampling values that are too small or too large. Using log-scaled hyperparameters can also help avoid numerical issues, such as underflow or overflow, that may occur when using linear-scaled hyperparameters. Using log-scaled hyperparameters can be done by setting the ScalingType parameter to Logarithmic when defining the hyperparameter ranges in Amazon SageMaker12

The other options are not valid or relevant guidelines for improving the automatic model tuning in Amazon SageMaker. Choosing the maximum number of hyperparameters supported by Amazon SageMaker to search the largest number of combinations possible is not a good practice, as it can increase the time and cost of the tuning job and make it harder to find the optimal values. Amazon SageMaker supports up to 20 hyperparameters for tuning, but it is recommended to choose only the most important and influential hyperparameters for the model and algorithm, and use default or fixed values for the rest3 Specifying a very large hyperparameter range to allow Amazon SageMaker to cover every possible value is not a good practice, as it can result in sampling values that are irrelevant or impractical for the model and algorithm, and waste the tuning budget. It is recommended to specify a reasonable and realistic hyperparameter range based on the prior knowledge and experience of the model and algorithm, and use the results of the tuning job to refine the range if needed4 Executing only one hyperparameter tuning job at a time and improving tuning through successive rounds of experiments is not a good practice, as it can limit the exploration and exploitation of the hyperparameter space and make the tuning process slower and less efficient. It is recommended to use parallelism and concurrency to run multiple training jobs simultaneously and leverage the Bayesian optimization algorithm that Amazon SageMaker uses to guide the search for the best hyperparameter values5

Amazon Rekognition is a service that provides computer vision capabilities for image and video analysis, such as object, scene, and activity detection, face and text recognition, and custom label detection. Amazon Rekognition can be used to automate the quality control process for plaques by comparing the images of the plaques with the images of defects in the Amazon S3 bucket and returning a confidence score for each defect. Amazon A2I is a service that enables human review of machine learning predictions, such as low-confidence predictions from Amazon Rekognition. Amazon A2I can be integrated with a private workforce option, which allows the engraving company to use its own internal team of reviewers to manually inspect the plaques that are flagged by Amazon Rekognition. This solution meets the requirements of automating the quality control process, sending low-confidence predictions to an internal team of reviewers, and using Amazon A2I for manual review. References:

1: Amazon Rekognition documentation

2: Amazon A2I documentation

3: Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels documentation

4: Amazon A2I Private Workforce documentation

To capture word context and sequential QA information, the embedding vectors need to consider both the order and the meaning of the words in the text.

Option B, Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm in Skip-gram mode, is a valid option because it can learn word embeddings that capture the semantic similarity and syntactic relations between words based on their co-occurrence in a window of words. Skip-gram mode can also handle rare words better than continuous bag-of-words (CBOW) mode1.

Option E, combination of the Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm in Batch Skip-gram mode with a custom recurrent neural network (RNN), is another valid option because it can leverage the advantages of Skip-gram mode and also use an RNN to model the sequential nature of the text. An RNN can capture the temporal dependencies and long-term dependencies between words, which are important for QA tasks2.

Option A, Amazon SageMaker seq2seq algorithm, is not a valid option because it is designed for sequence-to-sequence tasks such as machine translation, summarization, or chatbots. It does not produce embedding vectors for text series, but rather generates an output sequence given an input sequence3.

Option C, Amazon SageMaker Object2Vec algorithm, is not a valid option because it is designed for learning embeddings for pairs of objects, such as text-image, text-text, or image-image. It does not produce embedding vectors for text series, but rather learns a similarity function between pairs of objects4.

Option D, Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm in continuous bag-of-words (CBOW) mode, is not a valid option because it does not capture word context as well as Skip-gram mode. CBOW mode predicts a word given its surrounding words, while Skip-gram mode predicts the surrounding words given a word. CBOW mode is faster and more suitable for frequent words, but Skip-gram mode can learn more meaningful embeddings for rare words1.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker BlazingText

2: Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)

3: Amazon SageMaker Seq2Seq

4: Amazon SageMaker Object2Vec

Using AWS Glue to catalogue the data and Amazon Athena to run queries is the solution that requires the least effort to be able to query the data stored in an Amazon S3 bucket using SQL. AWS Glue is a service that provides a serverless data integration platform for data preparation and transformation. AWS Glue can automatically discover, crawl, and catalogue the data stored in various sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon RDS, Amazon Redshift, etc. AWS Glue can also use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest on the Glue Data Catalog and Glue ETL jobs. AWS Glue can handle both structured and unstructured data, and support various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, Parquet, etc. AWS Glue can also use built-in or custom classifiers to identify and parse the data schema and format1 Amazon Athena is a service that provides an interactive query engine that can run SQL queries directly on data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon Athena can integrate with AWS Glue to use the Glue Data Catalog as a central metadata repository for the data sources and tables. Amazon Athena can also use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest on Amazon S3 and the query results. Amazon Athena can query both structured and unstructured data, and support various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, Parquet, etc. Amazon Athena can also use partitions and compression to optimize the query performance and reduce the query cost23

The other options are not valid or require more effort to query the data stored in an Amazon S3 bucket using SQL. Using AWS Data Pipeline to transform the data and Amazon RDS to run queries is not a good option, as it involves moving the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon RDS, which can incur additional time and cost. AWS Data Pipeline is a service that can orchestrate and automate data movement and transformation across various AWS services and on-premises data sources. AWS Data Pipeline can be integrated with Amazon EMR to run ETL jobs on the data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon RDS is a service that provides a managed relational database service that can run various database engines, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, etc. Amazon RDS can use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest and in transit. Amazon RDS can run SQL queries on the data stored in the database tables45 Using AWS Batch to run ETL on the data and Amazon Aurora to run the queries is not a good option, as it also involves moving the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Aurora, which can incur additional time and cost. AWS Batch is a service that can run batch computing workloads on AWS. AWS Batch can be integrated with AWS Lambda to trigger ETL jobs on the data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon Aurora is a service that provides a compatible and scalable relational database engine that can run MySQL or PostgreSQL. Amazon Aurora can use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest and in transit. Amazon Aurora can run SQL queries on the data stored in the database tables. Using AWS Lambda to transform the data and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics to run queries is not a good option, as it is not suitable for querying data stored in Amazon S3 using SQL. AWS Lambda is a service that can run serverless functions on AWS. AWS Lambda can be integrated with Amazon S3 to trigger data transformation functions on the data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that can analyze streaming data using SQL or Apache Flink. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics can be integrated with Amazon Kinesis Data Streams or Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to ingest streaming data sources, such as web logs, social media, IoT devices, etc. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is not designed for querying data stored in Amazon S3 using SQL.

The best way to ensure that provisioned resources are being utilized effectively is to redeploy the model on an M5 instance and attach Amazon Elastic Inference to the instance. Amazon Elastic Inference allows you to attach low-cost GPU-powered acceleration to Amazon EC2 and Amazon SageMaker instances to reduce the cost of running deep learning inference by up to 75%. By using Amazon Elastic Inference, you can choose the instance type that is best suited to the overall CPU and memory needs of your application, and then separately configure the amount of inference acceleration that you need with no code changes. This way, you can avoid wasting GPU resources and pay only for what you use.

Option A is incorrect because a batch transform job is not suitable for real-time predictions. Batch transform is a high-performance and cost-effective feature for generating inferences using your trained models. Batch transform manages all of the compute resources required to get inferences. Batch transform is ideal for scenarios where you’re working with large batches of data, don’t need sub-second latency, or need to process data that is stored in Amazon S3.

Option C is incorrect because redeploying the model on a P3dn instance would not improve the resource utilization. P3dn instances are designed for distributed machine learning and high performance computing applications that need high network throughput and packet rate performance. They are not optimized for inference workloads.

Option D is incorrect because deploying the model onto an Amazon ECS cluster using a P3 instance would not ensure that provisioned resources are being utilized effectively. Amazon ECS is a fully managed container orchestration service that allows you to run and scale containerized applications on AWS. However, using Amazon ECS would not address the issue of underutilized GPU resources. In fact, it might introduce additional overhead and complexity in managing the cluster.

References:

Amazon Elastic Inference - Amazon SageMaker

Batch Transform - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon EC2 P3 Instances

Amazon EC2 P3dn Instances

Amazon Elastic Container Service

When a model shows poor accuracy on both the training and test datasets, it often indicates underfitting. To improve the model’s accuracy, the data scientist can:

Decrease regularization: Excessive regularization can lead to underfitting by constraining the model too much. Reducing it allows the model to capture more complexity.

Increase the number of training examples: Adding more data can help the model learn better and generalize well, especially if the dataset was previously insufficient.

Increase the number of model features: Adding relevant features can help the model capture more predictive information, thus potentially improving accuracy.

Options A, D, and F would either reduce the complexity or impact the generalization capability, which is not desirable in the case of underfitting.

 The best way to address the overfitting problem in image classification is to increase the dropout rate at the flatten layer because the model is not generalized enough. Dropout is a regularization technique that randomly drops out some units from the neural network during training, reducing the co-adaptation of features and preventing overfitting. The flatten layer is the layer that converts the output of the convolutional layers into a one-dimensional vector that can be fed into the dense layers. Increasing the dropout rate at the flatten layer means that more features from the convolutional layers will be ignored, forcing the model to learn more robust and generalizable representations from the remaining features.

The other options are not correct for this scenario because:

Increasing the learning rate would not help with the overfitting problem, as it would make the optimization process more unstable and prone to overshooting the global minimum. A high learning rate can also cause the model to diverge or oscillate around the optimal solution, resulting in poor performance and accuracy.

Increasing the dimensionality of the dense layer next to the flatten layer would not help with the overfitting problem, as it would make the model more complex and increase the number of parameters to be learned. A more complex model can fit the training data better, but it can also memorize the noise and irrelevant details in the data, leading to overfitting and poor generalization.

Increasing the epoch number would not help with the overfitting problem, as it would make the model train longer and more likely to overfit the training data. A high epoch number can cause the model to converge to the global minimum, but it can also cause the model to over-optimize the training data and lose the ability to generalize to new data.

References:

Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting

How to Reduce Overfitting With Dropout Regularization in Keras

How to Control the Stability of Training Neural Networks With the Learning Rate

How to Choose the Number of Hidden Layers and Nodes in a Feedforward Neural Network?

How to decide the optimal number of epochs to train a neural network?

A scatter plot showing the correlation between maximum tree depth and the objective metric is a visualization that can help the Machine Learning Specialist reconfigure the input hyperparameter range(s) for the tree-based ensemble model. A scatter plot is a type of graph that displays the relationship between two variables using dots, where each dot represents one observation. A scatter plot can show the direction, strength, and shape of the correlation between the variables, as well as any outliers or clusters. In this case, the scatter plot can show how the maximum tree depth, which is a hyperparameter that controls the complexity and depth of the decision trees in the ensemble model, affects the AUC, which is the objective metric that measures the performance of the model in terms of the trade-off between true positive rate and false positive rate. By looking at the scatter plot, the Machine Learning Specialist can see if there is a positive, negative, or no correlation between the maximum tree depth and the AUC, and how strong or weak the correlation is. The Machine Learning Specialist can also see if there is an optimal value or range of values for the maximum tree depth that maximizes the AUC, or if there is a point of diminishing returns or overfitting where increasing the maximum tree depth does not improve or even worsens the AUC. Based on the scatter plot, the Machine Learning Specialist can reconfigure the input hyperparameter range(s) for the maximum tree depth to focus on the values that yield the best AUC, and avoid the values that result in poor AUC. This can decrease the amount of time and cost it takes to train the model, as the hyperparameter tuning job can explore fewer and more promising combinations of values. A scatter plot can be created using various tools and libraries, such as Matplotlib, Seaborn, Plotly, etc12

The other options are not valid or relevant for reconfiguring the input hyperparameter range(s) for the tree-based ensemble model. A histogram showing whether the most important input feature is Gaussian is a visualization that can help the Machine Learning Specialist understand the distribution and shape of the input data, but not the hyperparameters. A histogram is a type of graph that displays the frequency or count of values in a single variable using bars, where each bar represents a bin or interval of values. A histogram can show if the variable is symmetric, skewed, or multimodal, and if it follows a normal or Gaussian distribution, which is a bell-shaped curve that is often assumed by many machine learning algorithms. In this case, the histogram can show if the most important input feature, which is a variable that has the most influence or predictive power on the output variable, is Gaussian or not. However, this does not help the Machine Learning Specialist reconfigure the input hyperparameter range(s) for the tree-based ensemble model, as the input feature is not a hyperparameter that can be tuned or optimized. A histogram can be created using various tools and libraries, such as Matplotlib, Seaborn, Plotly, etc34

A scatter plot with points colored by target variable that uses t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) to visualize the large number of input variables in an easier-to-read dimension is a visualization that can help the Machine Learning Specialist understand the structure and clustering of the input data, but not the hyperparameters. t-SNE is a technique that can reduce the dimensionality of high-dimensional data, such as images, text, or gene expression, and project it onto a lower-dimensional space, such as two or three dimensions, while preserving the local similarities and distances between the data points. t-SNE can help visualize and explore the patterns and relationships in the data, such as the clusters, outliers, or separability of the classes. In this case, the scatter plot can show how the input variables, which are the features or predictors of the output variable, are mapped onto a two-dimensional space using t-SNE, and how the points are colored by the target variable, which is the output or response variable that the model tries to predict. However, this does not help the Machine Learning Specialist reconfigure the input hyperparameter range(s) for the tree-based ensemble model, as the input variables and the target variable are not hyperparameters that can be tuned or optimized. A scatter plot with t-SNE can be created using various tools and libraries, such as Scikit-learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch, etc5

A scatter plot showing the performance of the objective metric over each training iteration is a visualization that can help the Machine Learning Specialist understand the learning curve and convergence of the model, but not the hyperparameters. A scatter plot is a type of graph that displays the relationship between two variables using dots, where each dot represents one observation. A scatter plot can show the direction, strength, and shape of the correlation between the variables, as well as any outliers or clusters. In this case, the scatter plot can show how the objective metric, which is the performance measure that the model tries to optimize, changes over each training iteration, which is the number of times that the model updates its parameters using a batch of data. A scatter plot can show if the objective metric improves, worsens, or stagnates over time, and if the model converges to a stable value or oscillates or diverges. However, this does not help the Machine Learning Specialist reconfigure the input hyperparameter range(s) for the tree-based ensemble model, as the objective metric and the training iteration are not hyperparameters that can be tuned or optimized. A scatter plot can be created using various tools and libraries, such as Matplotlib, Seaborn, Plotly, etc.

The solution that the agency should consider is to use a proxy server at each local office and for each camera, and stream the RTSP feed to a unique Amazon Kinesis Video Streams video stream. On each stream, use Amazon Rekognition Video and create a stream processor to detect faces from a collection of known employees, and alert when non-employees are detected.

This solution has the following advantages:

It can handle thousands of video cameras in real time, as Amazon Kinesis Video Streams can scale elastically to support any number of producers and consumers1.

It can leverage the Amazon Rekognition Video API, which is designed and optimized for video analysis, and can detect faces in challenging conditions such as low lighting, occlusions, and different poses2.

It can use a stream processor, which is a feature of Amazon Rekognition Video that allows you to create a persistent application that analyzes streaming video and stores the results in a Kinesis data stream3. The stream processor can compare the detected faces with a collection of known employees, which is a container for persisting faces that you want to search for in the input video stream4. The stream processor can also send notifications to Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) when non-employees are detected, which can trigger downstream actions such as sending alerts or storing the events in Amazon Elasticsearch Service (Amazon ES)3.

References:

1: What Is Amazon Kinesis Video Streams? - Amazon Kinesis Video Streams

2: Detecting and Analyzing Faces - Amazon Rekognition

3: Using Amazon Rekognition Video Stream Processor - Amazon Rekognition

4: Working with Stored Faces - Amazon Rekognition

AWS Glue DataBrew provides a no-code data preparation interface that enables business analysts to clean and transform data from various sources, including PostgreSQL databases, without needing programming skills. Amazon SageMaker Canvas offers a no-code interface for machine learning model training and predictions, allowing users to predict future production volume without coding expertise.

This solution meets the requirements efficiently by providing end-to-end data preparation and prediction modeling without requiring coding.

An Amazon S3 data lake is a cost-effective solution for storing and analyzing large amounts of time-based training data for a new model. Amazon S3 is a highly scalable, durable, and secure object storage service that can store any amount of data in any format. Amazon S3 also offers low-cost storage classes, such as S3 Standard-IA and S3 One Zone-IA, that can reduce the storage costs for infrequently accessed data. By using hourly object prefixes, the Machine Learning Specialist can organize the data into logical partitions based on the time of ingestion. This can enable efficient data access and management, as well as support incremental updates and deletes. The Specialist can also use Amazon S3 lifecycle policies to automatically transition the data to lower-cost storage classes or delete the data after a certain period of time. This way, the Specialist can always train on the last 24 hours of the data and optimize the storage costs.

References:

What is a data lake? - Amazon Web Services

Amazon S3 Storage Classes - Amazon Simple Storage Service

Managing your storage lifecycle - Amazon Simple Storage Service

Best Practices Design Patterns: Optimizing Amazon S3 Performance

Clustering is a machine learning technique that can group data points into clusters based on their similarity or proximity. Clustering can help discover the underlying structure and patterns in the data, as well as identify outliers or anomalies. Clustering can also be used for customer segmentation, which is the process of dividing customers into groups based on their characteristics, behaviors, preferences, or needs. Customer segmentation can help understand the key features and needs of different customer segments, as well as design and implement targeted marketing campaigns for each segment. In this case, the Marketing Manager at a pet insurance company plans to launch a targeted marketing campaign on social media to acquire new customers. To do this, the Manager can use clustering on customer profile data to understand the key characteristics of consumer segments, such as their demographics, pet types, policy preferences, premiums paid, claims made, etc. The Manager can then find similar profiles on social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc., by using the cluster features as filters or keywords. The Manager can then target these potential new customers with personalized and relevant ads or offers that match their segment’s needs and interests. This way, the Manager can implement a machine learning model to identify potential new customers on social media.

Amazon SageMaker supports encryption at rest for the ML storage volumes, the model artifacts, and the data in Amazon S3 using AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS). AWS KMS is a service that allows customers to create and manage encryption keys that can be used to encrypt data. AWS KMS also provides an audit trail of key usage by logging key events to AWS CloudTrail. Customers can use either AWS managed keys or customer managed keys to encrypt their data. AWS managed keys are created and managed by AWS on behalf of the customer, while customer managed keys are created and managed by the customer. Customer managed keys offer more control and flexibility over the key policies, permissions, and rotation. Therefore, to meet the requirements of the company, the best option is to use customer managed keys in AWS KMS to encrypt the ML data volumes, and to encrypt the model artifacts and data in Amazon S3.

The other options are not correct because:

Option A: AWS Cloud HSM is a service that provides hardware security modules (HSMs) to store and use encryption keys. AWS Cloud HSM is not integrated with Amazon SageMaker, and cannot be used to encrypt the ML data volumes, the model artifacts, or the data in Amazon S3. AWS Cloud HSM is more suitable for customers who need to meet strict compliance requirements or who need direct control over the HSMs.

Option B: SageMaker built-in transient keys are temporary keys that are used to encrypt the ML data volumes and are discarded immediately after encryption. These keys do not provide persistent encryption or logging of key usage. Enabling default encryption for new Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) volumes does not affect the ML data volumes, which are encrypted separately by SageMaker. Moreover, this option does not address the encryption of the model artifacts and data in Amazon S3.

Option D: AWS Security Token Service (AWS STS) is a service that provides temporary credentials to access AWS resources. AWS STS does not provide encryption keys or encryption services. AWS STS cannot be used to encrypt the ML storage volumes, the model artifacts, or the data in Amazon S3.

References:

Protect Data at Rest Using Encryption - Amazon SageMaker

What is AWS Key Management Service? - AWS Key Management Service

What is AWS CloudHSM? - AWS CloudHSM

What is AWS Security Token Service? - AWS Security Token Service

 A convolutional neural network (CNN) is a type of machine learning algorithm that is suitable for image classification tasks. A CNN consists of multiple layers that can extract features from images and learn to recognize patterns and objects. A CNN can also use transfer learning to leverage pre-trained models that have been trained on large-scale image datasets, such as ImageNet, and fine-tune them for specific tasks, such as detecting the company’s retail brand. A CNN can achieve high accuracy and performance for image classification problems, as it can handle complex and diverse images and reduce the dimensionality and noise of the input data. A CNN can be implemented using various frameworks and libraries, such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, Keras, MXNet, etc12

The other options are not valid or relevant for the image classification task. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) is a type of machine learning algorithm that is suitable for topic modeling tasks. LDA can discover the hidden topics and their proportions in a collection of text documents, such as news articles, tweets, reviews, etc. LDA is not applicable for image data, as it requires textual input and output. LDA can be implemented using various frameworks and libraries, such as Gensim, Scikit-learn, Mallet, etc34

Recurrent neural network (RNN) is a type of machine learning algorithm that is suitable for sequential data tasks. RNN can process and generate data that has temporal or sequential dependencies, such as natural language, speech, audio, video, etc. RNN is not optimal for image data, as it does not capture the spatial features and relationships of the pixels. RNN can be implemented using various frameworks and libraries, such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, Keras, MXNet, etc.

K-means is a type of machine learning algorithm that is suitable for clustering tasks. K-means can partition a set of data points into a predefined number of clusters, based on the similarity and distance between the data points. K-means is not suitable for image classification tasks, as it does not learn to label the images or detect the objects of interest. K-means can be implemented using various frameworks and libraries, such as Scikit-learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch, etc.

The most secure action to protect the data from being accessed and transferred to a remote host by malicious code accidentally installed on the training container is to enable network isolation for training jobs. Network isolation is a feature that allows you to run training and inference containers in internet-free mode, which blocks any outbound network calls from the containers, even to other AWS services such as Amazon S3. Additionally, no AWS credentials are made available to the container runtime environment. This way, you can prevent unauthorized access to your data and resources by malicious code or users. You can enable network isolation by setting the EnableNetworkIsolation parameter to True when you call CreateTrainingJob, CreateHyperParameterTuningJob, or CreateModel.

References:

Run Training and Inference Containers in Internet-Free Mode - Amazon SageMaker

The company wants to predict the demand for a new product that will soon be launched, based on the sales history of similar products. This is a time series forecasting problem, which requires a machine learning algorithm that can learn from historical data and generate future predictions.

One of the most suitable solutions for this problem is to use the Amazon SageMaker DeepAR algorithm, which is a supervised learning algorithm for forecasting scalar time series using recurrent neural networks (RNN). DeepAR can handle multiple related time series, such as the sales of different products, and learn a global model that captures the common patterns and trends across the time series. DeepAR can also generate probabilistic forecasts that provide confidence intervals and quantify the uncertainty of the predictions.

DeepAR can outperform traditional forecasting methods, such as ARIMA, especially when the dataset contains hundreds or thousands of related time series. DeepAR can also use the trained model to forecast the demand for new products that are similar to the ones it has been trained on, by using the categorical features that encode the product attributes. For example, the company can use the product type, brand, flavor, size, and price as categorical features to group the products and learn the typical behavior for each group.

Therefore, the Machine Learning Specialist should apply the Amazon SageMaker DeepAR algorithm to forecast the demand for the new product, by using the sales history of the existing products as the training dataset, and the product attributes as the categorical features.

References:

DeepAR Forecasting Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Now available in Amazon SageMaker: DeepAR algorithm for more accurate time series forecasting

The Amazon SageMaker k-Nearest-Neighbors (kNN) algorithm is a supervised learning algorithm that can perform both classification and regression tasks. It can also handle time series data, such as the air quality data in this case. The kNN algorithm works by finding the k most similar instances in the training data to a given query instance, and then predicting the output based on the average or majority of the outputs of the k nearest neighbors. The kNN algorithm can be configured to use different distance metrics, such as Euclidean or cosine, to measure the similarity between instances. To use the kNN algorithm on the single time series consisting of the full year of data, the Machine Learning Specialist needs to set the predictor_type parameter to regressor, as the output variable (air quality in parts per million of contaminates) is a continuous value. The kNN algorithm can then forecast the air quality for the next 2 days by finding the k most similar days in the past year and averaging their air quality values.

References:

Amazon SageMaker k-Nearest-Neighbors (kNN) Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Time Series Forecasting using k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) in Python | by …

Time Series Forecasting with k-Nearest Neighbors | by Nishant Malik …

The XGBoost algorithm is a popular machine learning technique for classification problems. It is based on the idea of boosting, which is to combine many weak learners (decision trees) into a strong learner (ensemble model).

The XGBoost algorithm can handle imbalanced data by using the scale_pos_weight parameter, which controls the balance of positive and negative weights in the objective function. A typical value to consider is the ratio of negative cases to positive cases in the data. By increasing this parameter, the algorithm will pay more attention to the minority class (positive) and reduce the number of false negatives.

The XGBoost algorithm can also use different evaluation metrics to optimize the model performance. The default metric is error, which is the misclassification rate. However, this metric can be misleading for imbalanced data, as it does not account for the different costs of false positives and false negatives. A better metric to use is AUC, which is the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The ROC curve plots the true positive rate against the false positive rate for different threshold values. The AUC measures how well the model can distinguish between the two classes, regardless of the threshold. By changing the eval_metric parameter to AUC, the algorithm will try to maximize the AUC score and reduce the number of false negatives.

Therefore, the combination of steps that should be taken to reduce the number of false negatives are to increase the scale_pos_weight parameter and change the eval_metric parameter to AUC.

References:

XGBoost Parameters

XGBoost for Imbalanced Classification

The algorithms that are best suited to this scenario are latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and neural topic modeling (NTM), as they are both unsupervised learning methods that can discover abstract topics from a collection of text documents. LDA and NTM can provide a list of the top words for each topic, as well as the topic distribution for each document, which can help the auditors assess the relevance and priority of the topic12.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option B: A random forest classifier is a supervised learning method that can perform classification or regression tasks by using an ensemble of decision trees. A random forest classifier is not suitable for discovering abstract topics from text documents, as it requires labeled data and predefined classes3.

Option D: A linear support vector machine is a supervised learning method that can perform classification or regression tasks by using a linear function that separates the data into different classes. A linear support vector machine is not suitable for discovering abstract topics from text documents, as it requires labeled data and predefined classes4.

Option E: A linear regression is a supervised learning method that can perform regression tasks by using a linear function that models the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. A linear regression is not suitable for discovering abstract topics from text documents, as it requires labeled data and a continuous output variable5.

References:

1: Latent Dirichlet Allocation

2: Neural Topic Modeling

3: Random Forest Classifier

4: Linear Support Vector Machine

5: Linear Regression

The best way to fix the problem without changing the Lambda code or data in DynamoDB is to add the unrecognized words as synonyms in the custom slot type. This way, Amazon Lex can resolve the synonyms to the corresponding slot values and pass them to the Lambda function. For example, if the slot type has a value “comedy” with synonyms “funny”, “fun”, and “humor”, then any of these words entered by the user will be resolved to “comedy” and the Lambda function can query the DynamoDB table for the book titles in that category. Adding synonyms to the custom slot type can be done easily using the Amazon Lex console or API, and does not require any code changes.

The other options are not correct because:

Option A: Adding the unrecognized words in the enumeration values list as new values in the slot type would not fix the problem, because the Lambda function and the DynamoDB table are not aware of these new values. The Lambda function would not be able to query the DynamoDB table for the book titles in the new categories, and the request would still fail. Moreover, adding new values to the slot type would increase the complexity and maintenance of the chatbot, as the Lambda function and the DynamoDB table would have to be updated accordingly.

Option B: Creating a new custom slot type, adding the unrecognized words to this slot type as enumeration values, and using this slot type for the slot would also not fix the problem, for the same reasons as option A. The Lambda function and the DynamoDB table would not be able to handle the new slot type and its values, and the request would still fail. Furthermore, creating a new slot type would require more effort and time than adding synonyms to the existing slot type.

Option C: Using the AMAZON.SearchQuery built-in slot types for custom searches in the database is not a suitable approach for this use case. The AMAZON.SearchQuery slot type is used to capture free-form user input that corresponds to a search query. However, this slot type does not perform any validation or resolution of the user input, and passes the raw input to the Lambda function. This means that the Lambda function would have to handle the logic of parsing and matching the user input to the DynamoDB table, which would require changing the Lambda code and adding more complexity to the solution.

References:

Custom slot type - Amazon Lex

Using Synonyms - Amazon Lex

Built-in Slot Types - Amazon Lex

 AWS KMS is a service that provides encryption and key management for data stored in AWS services and applications. AWS KMS can generate and manage encryption keys that are used to encrypt and decrypt data at rest and in transit. AWS KMS can also integrate with other AWS services, such as Amazon S3 and Amazon SageMaker, to enable encryption of data using the keys stored in AWS KMS. Amazon S3 is a service that provides object storage for data in the cloud. Amazon S3 can use AWS KMS to encrypt data at rest using server-side encryption with AWS KMS-managed keys (SSE-KMS). Amazon SageMaker is a service that provides a platform for building, training, and deploying machine learning models. Amazon SageMaker can use AWS KMS to encrypt data at rest on the SageMaker instances and volumes, as well as data in transit between SageMaker and other AWS services. AWS Glue is a service that provides a serverless data integration platform for data preparation and transformation. AWS Glue can use AWS KMS to encrypt data at rest on the Glue Data Catalog and Glue ETL jobs. AWS Glue can also use built-in or custom classifiers to identify and redact sensitive data, such as credit card numbers, from the customer data1234

The other options are not valid or secure ways to encrypt the data and protect the credit card information. Using a custom encryption algorithm to encrypt the data and store the data on an Amazon SageMaker instance in a VPC is not a good practice, as custom encryption algorithms are not recommended for security and may have flaws or vulnerabilities. Using the SageMaker DeepAR algorithm to randomize the credit card numbers is not a good practice, as DeepAR is a forecasting algorithm that is not designed for data anonymization or encryption. Using an IAM policy to encrypt the data on the Amazon S3 bucket and Amazon Kinesis to automatically discard credit card numbers and insert fake credit card numbers is not a good practice, as IAM policies are not meant for data encryption, but for access control and authorization. Amazon Kinesis is a service that provides real-time data streaming and processing, but it does not have the capability to automatically discard or insert data values. Using an Amazon SageMaker launch configuration to encrypt the data once it is copied to the SageMaker instance in a VPC is not a good practice, as launch configurations are not meant for data encryption, but for specifying the instance type, security group, and user data for the SageMaker instance. Using the SageMaker principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm to reduce the length of the credit card numbers is not a good practice, as PCA is a dimensionality reduction algorithm that is not designed for data anonymization or encryption.

SageMaker Data Wrangler is a feature of SageMaker Studio that provides an end-to-end solution for importing, preparing, transforming, featurizing, and analyzing data. Data Wrangler includes built-in analyses that help generate visualizations and data insights in a few clicks. One of the built-in analyses is the Quick Model visualization, which can be used to quickly evaluate the data and produce importance scores for each feature. A feature importance score indicates how useful a feature is at predicting a target label. The feature importance score is between [0, 1] and a higher number indicates that the feature is more important to the whole dataset. The Quick Model visualization uses a random forest model to calculate the feature importance for each feature using the Gini importance method. This method measures the total reduction in node impurity (a measure of how well a node separates the classes) that is attributed to splitting on a particular feature. The ML developer can use the Quick Model visualization to obtain the importance scores for each feature of the dataset and use them to feature engineer the dataset. This solution requires the least development effort compared to the other options.

References:

•Analyze and Visualize

•Detect multicollinearity, target leakage, and feature correlation with Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler

The best option is to use AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) with table mapping to select PostgreSQL tables with no sensitive data through an SSL connection. Replicate data directly into Amazon S3. This option meets the following requirements:

It ensures that only nonsensitive data is transferred to the cloud by using table mapping to filter out the tables that contain sensitive data1.

It uses IPsec to secure the data transfer by enabling SSL encryption for the AWS DMS endpoint2.

It uploads the data to Amazon S3 each day for model retraining by using the ongoing replication feature of AWS DMS3.

The other options are not as effective or feasible as the option above. Creating an AWS Glue job to connect to the PostgreSQL DB instance and ingest data through an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection directly into Amazon S3 is possible, but it requires more steps and resources than using AWS DMS. Also, it does not specify how to filter out the sensitive data from the tables. Creating an AWS Glue job to connect to the PostgreSQL DB instance and ingest all data through an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection into Amazon S3 while removing sensitive data using a PySpark job is also possible, but it is more complex and error-prone than using AWS DMS. Also, it does not use IPsec as required. Using PostgreSQL logical replication to replicate all data to PostgreSQL in Amazon EC2 through AWS Direct Connect with a VPN connection, and then using AWS Glue to move data from Amazon EC2 to Amazon S3 is not feasible, because PostgreSQL logical replication does not support replicating only a subset of data4. Also, it involves unnecessary data movement and additional costs.

References:

Table mapping - AWS Database Migration Service

Using SSL to encrypt a connection to a DB instance - AWS Database Migration Service

Ongoing replication - AWS Database Migration Service

Logical replication - PostgreSQL

To build a conversational interface that can use natural language to get data from the reports, the company can use a combination of services that can handle both written and spoken inputs, understand the user’s intent and query, and extract the relevant information from the reports. The services that can be used for this purpose are:

Amazon Lex: A service for building conversational interfaces into any application using voice and text. Amazon Lex can create chatbots that can interact with users using natural language, and integrate with other AWS services such as Amazon Connect, Amazon Comprehend, and Amazon Transcribe. Amazon Lex can also use lambda functions to implement the business logic and fulfill the user’s requests.

Amazon Comprehend: A service for natural language processing and text analytics. Amazon Comprehend can analyze text and speech inputs and extract insights such as entities, key phrases, sentiment, syntax, and topics. Amazon Comprehend can also use custom classifiers and entity recognizers to identify specific terms and concepts that are relevant to the domain of the reports.

Amazon Transcribe: A service for speech-to-text conversion. Amazon Transcribe can transcribe audio inputs into text outputs, and add punctuation and formatting. Amazon Transcribe can also use custom vocabularies and language models to improve the accuracy and quality of the transcription for the specific domain of the reports.

Therefore, the company can use the following architecture to build the conversational interface:

Use Amazon Lex to create a chatbot that can accept both written and spoken inputs from the executives. The chatbot can use intents, utterances, and slots to capture the user’s query and parameters, such as the report name, date, metric, or filter.

Use Amazon Transcribe to convert the spoken inputs into text outputs, and pass them to Amazon Lex. Amazon Transcribe can use a custom vocabulary and language model to recognize the terms and concepts related to the reports.

Use Amazon Comprehend to analyze the text inputs and outputs, and extract the relevant information from the reports. Amazon Comprehend can use a custom classifier and entity recognizer to identify the report name, date, metric, or filter from the user’s query, and the corresponding data from the reports.

Use a lambda function to implement the business logic and fulfillment of the user’s query, such as retrieving the data from the reports, performing calculations or aggregations, and formatting the response. The lambda function can also handle errors and validations, and provide feedback to the user.

Use Amazon Lex to return the response to the user, either in text or speech format, depending on the user’s preference.

References:

What Is Amazon Lex?

What Is Amazon Comprehend?

What Is Amazon Transcribe?

Normalization is a data preprocessing technique that can be used to scale the input features to a common range, such as [-1, 1] or [0, 1]. Normalization can help reduce the effect of outliers, improve the convergence of gradient-based algorithms, and prevent variables with a larger magnitude from dominating the model. One common method of normalization is standardization, which transforms each feature to have a mean of 0 and a variance of 1. This can be done by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation of each feature. Standardization can be useful for models that assume the input features are normally distributed, such as linear regression, logistic regression, and support vector machines. References:

Data normalization and standardization: A video that explains the concept and benefits of data normalization and standardization.

Standardize or Normalize?: A blog post that compares different methods of scaling the input features.

To secure calls to the Amazon SageMaker Service API, the ML specialist should take the following steps:

Modify the security group on the endpoint network interface to restrict access to the instances. This will allow the ML specialist to control which instances in the VPC can communicate with the VPC interface endpoint for the Amazon SageMaker Service API. The security group can specify inbound and outbound rules based on the instance IDs, IP addresses, or CIDR blocks1.

Add a SageMaker Runtime VPC endpoint interface to the VPC. This will allow the ML specialist to invoke the SageMaker endpoints from within the VPC without using the public internet. The SageMaker Runtime VPC endpoint interface connects the VPC directly to the SageMaker Runtime using AWS PrivateLink2.

The other options are not as effective or necessary as the steps above. Adding a VPC endpoint policy to allow access to the IAM users is not required, as the IAM users can already access the Amazon SageMaker Service API through the VPC interface endpoint. Modifying the users’ IAM policy to allow access to Amazon SageMaker Service API calls only is not sufficient, as it does not prevent unauthorized instances from accessing the VPC interface endpoint. Modifying the ACL on the endpoint network interface to restrict access to the instances is not possible, as network ACLs are associated with subnets, not network interfaces3.

References:

Security groups for your VPC - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Connect to SageMaker Within your VPC - Amazon SageMaker

Network ACLs - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

The Data Science team is facing a problem of imbalanced data, where the positive class (paid users) is much less frequent than the negative class (non-paid users). This can cause the random forest model to be biased towards the majority class and have poor performance on the minority class. To mitigate this issue, the Data Science team can try the following approaches:

C. Generate more positive samples by duplicating the positive samples and adding a small amount of noise to the duplicated data. This is a technique called data augmentation, which can help increase the size and diversity of the training data for the minority class. This can help the random forest model learn more features and patterns from the positive class and reduce the imbalance ratio.

D. Change the cost function so that false negatives have a higher impact on the cost value than false positives. This is a technique called cost-sensitive learning, which can assign different weights or costs to different classes or errors. By assigning a higher cost to false negatives (predicting non-paid when the user is actually paid), the random forest model can be more sensitive to the minority class and try to minimize the misclassification of the positive class.

References:

Bagging and Random Forest for Imbalanced Classification

Surviving in a Random Forest with Imbalanced Datasets

machine learning - random forest for imbalanced data? - Cross Validated

Biased Random Forest For Dealing With the Class Imbalance Problem

CNN-QR is a proprietary machine learning algorithm for forecasting time series using causal convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNN-QR works best with large datasets containing hundreds of time series. It accepts item metadata, and is the only Forecast algorithm that accepts related time series data without future values. In this case, the power company has historical power consumption data for the last 10 years, which is a large dataset with multiple time series. The data also includes related data such as weather, number of individuals on the property, and public holidays, which can be used as item metadata or related time series data. Therefore, CNN-QR is the most suitable algorithm for this scenario. References: Amazon Forecast Algorithms, Amazon Forecast CNN-QR

 The best model for predicting housing prices based on a historical dataset with 32 features is linear regression. Linear regression is a supervised learning algorithm that fits a linear relationship between a dependent variable (housing price) and one or more independent variables (features). Linear regression can handle multiple features and output a continuous value for the housing price. Linear regression can also return the coefficients of the features, which indicate how each feature affects the housing price. Linear regression is suitable for this problem because the outcome of interest is numerical and continuous, and the model needs to capture the linear relationship between the features and the outcome.

References:

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Training - Regression vs Classification in Machine Learning

AWS Machine Learning Training - Linear Regression with Amazon SageMaker

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a fully managed service that can capture, transform, and load streaming data into AWS data stores, such as Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, Amazon Elasticsearch Service, and Splunk. It can also invoke AWS Lambda functions to perform custom transformations on the data. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that can analyze streaming data in real time using SQL or Apache Flink applications. It can also use machine learning algorithms, such as Random Cut Forest (RCF), to perform anomaly detection on streaming data. RCF is an unsupervised learning algorithm that assigns an anomaly score to each data point based on how different it is from the rest of the data. By using Kinesis Data Firehose and Kinesis Data Analytics, the cybersecurity company can ingest the data in real time, score the malicious events as anomalies, and stream the results to Amazon S3, which can serve as a data lake for later processing and analysis. This is the most efficient way to accomplish these tasks, as it does not require any additional infrastructure, coding, or training.

References:

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose - Amazon Web Services

Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics - Amazon Web Services

Anomaly Detection with Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics - Amazon Web Services

[AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Sample Questions]

The best solution for this scenario is to perform forecasting by using claim IDs and dates to identify the expected number of claims in each outcome category every month. This solution has the following advantages:

It leverages the historical data of claim outcomes and dates to capture the temporal patterns and trends of the claims in each category1.

It does not require the claim contents or any other features to make predictions, which simplifies the data preparation and reduces the impact of missing or incomplete data2.

It can handle the high cardinality of the outcome categories, as forecasting models can output multiple values for each time point3.

It can provide predictions for several months in advance, which is useful for planning and budgeting purposes4.

The other solutions have the following drawbacks:

A: Performing classification every month by using supervised learning of the 200 outcome categories based on claim contents is not suitable, because it assumes that the claim contents are available and complete for all the records, which is not the case in this scenario2. Moreover, classification models usually output a single label for each input, which is not adequate for predicting the number of claims in each category3. Additionally, classification models do not account for the temporal aspect of the data, which is important for forecasting1.

B: Performing reinforcement learning by using claim IDs and dates and instructing the insurance agents who submit the claim records to estimate the expected number of claims in each outcome category every month is not feasible, because it requires a feedback loop between the model and the agents, which might not be available or reliable in this scenario5. Furthermore, reinforcement learning is more suitable for sequential decision making problems, where the model learns from its actions and rewards, rather than forecasting problems, where the model learns from historical data and outputs future values6.

D: Performing classification by using supervised learning of the outcome categories for which partial information on claim contents is provided and performing forecasting by using claim IDs and dates for all other outcome categories is not optimal, because it combines two different methods that might not be consistent or compatible with each other7. Also, this solution suffers from the same limitations as solution A, such as the dependency on claim contents, the inability to handle multiple outputs, and the ignorance of temporal patterns123.

References:

1: Time Series Forecasting - Amazon SageMaker

2: Handling Missing Data for Machine Learning | AWS Machine Learning Blog

3: Forecasting vs Classification: What’s the Difference? | DataRobot

4: Amazon Forecast – Time Series Forecasting Made Easy | AWS News Blog

5: Reinforcement Learning - Amazon SageMaker

6: What is Reinforcement Learning? The Complete Guide | Edureka

7: Combining Machine Learning Models | by Will Koehrsen | Towards Data Science

Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that allows users to analyze streaming data in real time using SQL queries. Amazon Random Cut Forest (RCF) is a SQL extension that enables anomaly detection on streaming data. RCF is an unsupervised machine learning algorithm that assigns an anomaly score to each data point based on how different it is from the rest of the data. A sliding window is a type of window that moves along with the data stream, so that the anomaly detection model can adapt to changing patterns over time. A tumbling window is a type of window that has a fixed size and does not overlap with other windows, so that the anomaly detection model is based on a fixed period of time. Therefore, option D is the best approach to meet the requirements of the question, as it uses RCF to calculate anomaly scores for each web traffic entry and uses a sliding window to adapt to changing web patterns over time.

Option A is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest (RCF) is a built-in model that can be used to train and deploy anomaly detection models on batch or streaming data, but it requires more steps and resources than using the RCF SQL extension in Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics. Option B is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker XGBoost is a built-in model that can be used for supervised learning tasks such as classification and regression, but not for unsupervised learning tasks such as anomaly detection. Option C is incorrect because k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) is a SQL extension that can be used for classification and regression tasks on streaming data, but not for anomaly detection. Moreover, using a tumbling window would not allow the anomaly detection model to adapt to changing web patterns over time.

References:

Using CloudWatch anomaly detection

Anomaly Detection With CloudWatch

Performing Real-time Anomaly Detection using AWS

What Is AWS Anomaly Detection? (And Is There A Better Option?)

The data scientist should use Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to sort the data into two groups named “enrolled” or “not enrolled.” This will create a labeled dataset that can be used for supervised learning. The data scientist should then use a classification algorithm to run predictions on the test data. A classification algorithm is a suitable choice for predicting a binary outcome, such as enrollment status, based on the input features, such as academic performance. A classification algorithm will output a probability for each class label and assign the most likely label to each observation.

References:

Use Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to Label Data

Classification Algorithm in Machine Learning

The best solution for this scenario is to use shadow deployment, which is a technique that allows the company to run the new experimental model in parallel with the existing model, without exposing it to the end users. In shadow deployment, the company can route the same user requests to both models, but only return the responses from the existing model to the users. The responses from the new experimental model are logged and analyzed for quality and performance metrics, such as accuracy, latency, and resource consumption12. This way, the company can validate the new experimental model in a production environment, without affecting the current live traffic or user experience.

The other solutions are not suitable, because they have the following drawbacks:

A: A/B testing is a technique that involves splitting the user traffic between two or more models, and comparing their outcomes based on predefined metrics. However, this technique exposes the new experimental model to a portion of the end users, which might affect their experience if the model is not reliable or consistent with the existing model3.

B: Canary release is a technique that involves gradually rolling out the new experimental model to a small subset of users, and monitoring its performance and feedback. However, this technique also exposes the new experimental model to some end users, and requires careful selection and segmentation of the user groups4.

D: Blue/green deployment is a technique that involves switching the user traffic from the existing model (blue) to the new experimental model (green) at once, after testing and verifying the new model in a separate environment. However, this technique does not allow the company to validate the new experimental model in a production environment, and might cause service disruption or inconsistency if the new model is not compatible or stable5.

References:

1: Shadow Deployment: A Safe Way to Test in Production | LaunchDarkly Blog

2: Shadow Deployment: A Safe Way to Test in Production | LaunchDarkly Blog

3: A/B Testing for Machine Learning Models | AWS Machine Learning Blog

4: Canary Releases for Machine Learning Models | AWS Machine Learning Blog

5: Blue-Green Deployments for Machine Learning Models | AWS Machine Learning Blog

The most direct approach to solve this problem within 2 days is to train a custom classifier by using Amazon Comprehend. Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing (NLP) service that can analyze text and extract insights such as sentiment, entities, topics, and syntax. Amazon Comprehend also provides a custom classification feature that allows users to create and train a custom text classifier using their own labeled data. The custom classifier can then be used to categorize any text document into one or more custom classes. For this use case, the custom classifier can be trained to identify reviews that express concerns over product durability as a class, and use the star rating, review text, and review summary fields as input features. The custom classifier can be created and trained using the Amazon Comprehend console or API, and does not require any coding or machine learning expertise. The training process is fully managed and scalable, and can handle large and complex datasets. The custom classifier can be trained and ready to review in 2 days or less, depending on the size and quality of the dataset.

The other options are not the most direct approaches because:

Option B: Building a recurrent neural network (RNN) in Amazon SageMaker by using Gluon and Apache MXNet is a more complex and time-consuming approach that requires coding and machine learning skills. RNNs are a type of deep learning models that can process sequential data, such as text, and learn long-term dependencies between tokens. Gluon is a high-level API for MXNet that simplifies the development of deep learning models. Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that provides tools and frameworks for building, training, and deploying machine learning models. However, to use this approach, the machine learning specialist would have to write custom code to preprocess the data, define the RNN architecture, train the model, and evaluate the results. This would likely take more than 2 days and involve more administrative overhead.

Option C: Training a built-in BlazingText model using Word2Vec mode in Amazon SageMaker is not a suitable approach for text classification. BlazingText is a built-in algorithm in Amazon SageMaker that provides highly optimized implementations of the Word2Vec and text classification algorithms. The Word2Vec algorithm is useful for generating word embeddings, which are dense vector representations of words that capture their semantic and syntactic similarities. However, word embeddings alone are not sufficient for text classification, as they do not account for the context and structure of the text documents. To use this approach, the machine learning specialist would have to combine the word embeddings with another classifier model, such as a logistic regression or a neural network, which would add more complexity and time to the solution.

Option D: Using a built-in seq2seq model in Amazon SageMaker is not a relevant approach for text classification. Seq2seq is a built-in algorithm in Amazon SageMaker that provides a sequence-to-sequence framework for neural machine translation based on MXNet. Seq2seq is a supervised learning algorithm that can generate an output sequence of tokens given an input sequence of tokens, such as translating a sentence from one language to another. However, seq2seq is not designed for text classification, which requires assigning a label or a category to a text document, not generating another text sequence. To use this approach, the machine learning specialist would have to modify the seq2seq algorithm to fit the text classification task, which would be challenging and inefficient.

References:

Custom Classification - Amazon Comprehend

Build a Text Classification Model with Amazon Comprehend - AWS Machine Learning Blog

Recurrent Neural Networks - Gluon API

BlazingText Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Sequence-to-Sequence Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker