L4M3 Commercial Contracting Questions and Answers

Hank’s pre-contractual assurances may amount to misrepresentation. Remedies for misrepresentation could be rescission of contract or damages. Rescission will be impossible in the following instance:

- Where the innocent party has affirmed the contract; that is, acted in a way confirming that they wish it to continue

- Where the claim has not been brought within a reasonable time (this is a point of general law)

- Where restitution (returning to the pre-contractual position) is impossible (e.g. because the goods have been consumed or have deteriorated)

- Where there has been intervention of innocent third-party (e.g., if the goods have been sold on)

In this case, the subject of contract is designing, building and managing the new CRM system which is impossible to be restituted. Therefore, the contract cannot be rescinded.

Express terms are the terms of the agreement which are expressly agreed between the parties. Ideally, they will be written down in a contract between the parties but where the contract is agreed verbally, they will be the terms discussed and agreed between the parties.

Implied terms are terms implied into the contract by the courts. They are not expressly set out in the contract but are taken to be as effective as if they were and as if they had been included from day one of the contract. The express terms and any implied terms together create the legally binding obligations on the parties.

The contract provision that relieves the parties from performing their contractual obligations when certain circumstances like natural disasters, terrorist attacks, etc arise is called Force majeure. Force majeure is an example of exclusion clause.

An exemption clause in a contract is a term which either limits or excludes a party’s liability for a breach of contract. In order for an exclusion clause to be binding and operable upon the parties, the clause must:

1. The clause must be incorporated into the contract as a term.

2. The clause must pass the test of construction.

3. The clause must not be rendered unenforceable by the statutory provisions in the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 or the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (enacting the Consumer Rights Bill 2013-14).

A framework agreement is an agreement with one or more suppliers/providers which sets out terms and conditions under which individual contracts (call-offs) can be made throughout the term of the agreement.

A framework agreement itself is not a contract, but the call-offs made from it are.

Framework arrangements create a streamlined and flexible process for procuring goods, works or services

Where a framework for the same goods, works or services is awarded to several suppliers, there are three possible options for awarding call-off contracts: direct award (or direct call-off), mini-competition or a combination of both.

Option 1 – Apply the terms of the framework agreement (direct award).

Where your requirements match the terms and/or specification of the framework agreement (in the event of any query, you should clarify the situation with the organisation that established the framework), a particular call-off should be awarded without re-opening competition. The call-off should be awarded to the provider who is identified as the most economically advantageous tender based on the award criteria used at the time that the framework was established (i.e. the supplier ranked no. 1). Randomly selecting a supplier off a framework is not permitted.

Option 2 – Hold a mini-competition between capable suppliers.

If your requirements do not match the terms and/or the specification of the framework, you should conduct a mini-competition exercise. Whilst it is not permitted to substantially change the basic terms or specification of the framework, in running a mini-competition it is possible to supplement or refine the basic terms of the framework prior to making a call-off. Examples of such terms are:

- The particular goods/services/works required;

- Particular delivery timescales;

- Particular invoicing arrangements and payment profiles;

- Associated services such as installation, maintenance and training;

- Quantity;

- Functional specification.

Under no circumstances should brand names or brand-specific descriptions of goods be used e.g. BIC Biro Pen, Hewlett-Packard Printer, Dell computer. Descriptions should give reference to the characteristics and outputs of the product or service. Where no other description is possible, any reference should be qualified by adding the words ‘or equivalent’.

When a mini-competition exercise is held, all suppliers appointed to the framework that are capable of meeting the requirement must be invited to submit a tender. (This might just relate to suppliers within a particular ‘lot’). You must not limit the mini-competition exercise to selected providers. A time limit for submitting the tender must be set and advised to competing suppliers. This time limit must be reasonable, taking account of the complexity of the requirement.

The call-off must be awarded on the basis of the framework award criteria and new criteria cannot be added, although, where permitted, the weightings may be varied to take account of a particular requirement. However, in adjusting the weightings, care must be taken to ensure that any such changes do not have an adverse effect on competition.

Option 3 - Combination of direct award and mini-competition

To use a combination approach, the procurement documents must state that this route may be used. The procurement documents will also specify which terms may be subject to the re-opening of competition.

Request for quotations is often used when the only variable is price and the purchase value is under a financial threshold. This process is less formal than ITT. RFQ should be used in the following circumstances:

- Low-value, low-risk purchases

- When the specifications are sufficiently defined or the product/service is standardised

- Where the suppliers are pre-qualified

- Where there is a framework agreement which specifies the contract terms and conditions.

United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Vienna Convention or CISG)

Vienna Convention was prepared by by the United Nations Commission on ¬International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and adopted by a diplomatic conference on 11 April 1980. The Convention was welcomed by several countries from different geographic areas, with different legal and political systems. As of 20 August 2020, the Convention has93 Contracting States. The Convention has proved the effectiveness of an uniform text on international trade law.

What CISG covers, and what it does not

In the 6 first articles of the Convention, the authors set up the boundaries of its application.

First is about where it applies. According to UNCITRAL, the Convention applies to contracts of sale of goods between parties whose places of business are in different States and either both of those States are Contracting States or the rules of private international law lead to the law of a Contracting State. A few States have availed themselves of the authorisation in article 95 to declare that they would apply the Convention only in the former and not in the latter of these two situations. As the Convention becomes more widely adopted, the practical significance of such a declaration will diminish. Finally, the Convention may also apply as the law applicable to the contract if so chosen by the parties. In that case, the operation of the Convention will be subject to any limits on contractual stipulations set by the otherwise applicable law.

Second, the Convention has a list of goods that are not subject to its application in Article 2. Article 3 clarifies the differences between manufacturing contracts and sale contract.

Third, Article 4 and 5 clearly states what CISG does not covers, including grounds for contract invalidity and liabilities to death or injury of person caused by the the goods

Finally, the Convention respects the contractual freedom of the trading parties. Trading parties may select this convention as governing law or select other instrument, such as UPICC or domestic laws.

A previously used specification must always be robustly challenged to see how well it fits the proposed circumstances. Aspects which appear not to fit should be analysed to understand why they were included in the sample specification and whether this changes the view on whether or not they should be omitted or changed.

Standard terms and conditions are set of terms that is prepared by an organisation. These terms can become the governing terms in low-value, low-risk transactions (or Routine items according to Kraljic's portfolio model). They can be a reference when negotiating for more important contract.

Gainsharing is a system of management used by a business to increase profitability by motivating suppliers to improve their performance. As their performance meets the targets, suppliers share financially in the gain (improvement). Gainshare is an incentive for cost control.

Other incentives for good performance are:

- Contract extensions: Buyer can extend the contract duration as an incentive to supplier for meeting their targets.

- Accelerated payments

Advantages of using invitation to tender may be as below:

No Nepotism: Tenders or bids are evaluated on the basis of certain predetermined criteria, such as price, quality and value for money. In other words, the firm offering the highest quality product or service at the lowest price point would win the contract. As most tender documents are opened and evaluated in a public process, I think that there remains little room for nepotism or favoritism of any kind.

Value for Money: From the perspective of the client, tenders offer the greatest value for the amount of money spent. This is due to the fact that the client can choose from a wide pool of potential suppliers to select the ones that can produce the highest quality product or service at the lowest price point. This allows the company, establishment or organization to save money without having to compromise on quality. Therefore, despite being quite time consuming, tendering is, in my opinion, a profitable long-term process from an organization’s point of view.

Encourages Competition: The process of tendering helps promote a competitive market. This is because a number of potential contractors, firms or suppliers get a chance to bid for every project. And because selection depends on quality and price, every bidder tries to reduce operational inefficiencies and redundancies as much as possible in order to lower expenses and improve quality. This entire process encourages healthy competition in the market and prevents complacency and laziness, which in turn provides a boost to innovation and new ideas.

Easier Entry: The system of tendering makes it easier and simpler for new firms to enter the market or even a particular industry. This is due to the fact that contracts under this system are awarded on the basis of predetermined, objective criteria. As a result, even a firm that is a new entrant to the market, having no connections or contacts in the industry, can win a prestigious and lucrative contract by providing the highest value for the client’s money. This process therefore helps new firms to quickly get a foothold in the market or industry, thus significantly lowering the traditional barriers to entry.

SFO issued an RFQ with defined terms and condition and detailed specification. This RFQ can be considered as an invitation to treat. Vogon's quotation is an answer to the purchaser's RFQ and is an offer to SFO. The contract come to life at the time Vogon received the notification from SFO senior management.

The strike may be a force majeur event, depending on the contract particular clauses and jurisdiction. In common law countries, force majeur is applicable as an exclusion of liability only if the contract allows it. In many civil law countries, force majeur is an implied term. But in every jurisdiction, force majeur is only a reason for excluding liability for non-performance of a contract. In other words, the non-performance party is not liable for any breach if force majeur event occurs but the event does not exclude the breach.

LO 1, AC 1.2

A standard is a document that sets out requirements for a specific item, material, component, system or service, or describes in detail a particular method or procedure. Standards are established by consensus and approved by recognized standardization bodies.

There are several different types of standards. Some of the most commonly-used standards set out the requirements that a particular kind of product, service or process must fulfil, in order to establish that it is ‘fit for purpose’. Other types of standard relate to methods of testing, terminology and definitions, information requirements, or the compatibility of connections.

Standards provide individuals, businesses and all kinds of organizations with a common basis for mutual understanding. They are especially useful for communication, measurement, commerce and manufacturing.

Standards make trade easier by ensuring compatibility and interoperability of components, products and services. They bring benefits to businesses and consumers in terms of reducing costs, enhancing performance and improving safety.

Standards are voluntary, which means that businesses and other organizations are not legally obliged to apply them. However, in certain cases standards may facilitate compliance with legal requirements, such as those contained in European directives and regulations.

Standards can be made by a company, a standard organisation (such as ISO or BSI) or regulatory bodies.

A contract for window cleaning during the next three months is a short-term service contract in which changes of input costs (labour, tools,...) are very unlikely to happen.

Fixed pricing arrangement is useful for small to medium scope project, with short timelines, where what is delivered can be adequately specified and the likelihood of changes to the specification, scope and input costs is limited.

Construction procurement is particularly complex and risky. Forming a contract in construction may take lots of time and energy of both client and contractor. Therefore, standardisation in construction contract would help the buying organisation to save their precious resources. Furthermore, the wording of these model form contracts is accurate as it has been agreed among the professionals within an industry.

One of the advantage of using model forms of contract is the balanced of risk and reward allocation between the contractor, consultant engineer and the client.

One-off contract is the type of contract that relates to a single purchase. One-off contracts can be used for goods, services or works. One-off contract can be simple (such as buying a small number of office stationeries) or complex (such as a construction project or buying an aircraft).

A one-off contract lasts “until completion of the obligations of the parties”. The performance is unlikely to be improved during contract performance since the duration is relatively shorter than framework agreement or call-off contract.

Ad-hoc purchase is an item bought for a single and non-recurring use or purpose. Ad-hoc purchase is a type of one-off contract.

An untrue statement of fact or law made by Party A (or its agent) to Party B, which induces Party B to enter a contract with Party A thereby causing Party B loss. An action for misrepresentation can be brought in respect of a misrepresentation of fact or law.

There are three types of misrepresentation:

- Fraudulent misrepresentation: where a false representation has been made knowingly, or without belief in its truth, or recklessly as to its truth.

- Negligent misrepresentation: a representation made carelessly and in breach of duty owed by Party A to Party B to take reasonable care that the representation is accurate. If no "special relationship" exists, there may be a misrepresentation under section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 where a statement is made carelessly or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth.

- Innocent misrepresentation: a representation that is neither fraudulent nor negligent.

The remedies for misrepresentation are rescission and/or damages. For fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, the claimant may claim rescission and damages. For innocent misrepresentation, the court has a discretion to award damages in lieu of rescission; the court cannot award both (see section 2(2) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967). For more information, see Practice note, Misrepresentation.

Product Liability Insurance is a form of general liability insurance meant to protect a business from financial and legal consequences as a result of bodily injury or property damage due to the use of the business’s sold goods or products. Situations that are typically covered by Product Liability Insurance may include:

- A customer harms herself because of the faulty packaging on one of your products

- A drapery set that a customer purchased from your business was highly flammable and caught on fire, eventually damaging her entire kitchen

- A customer with a severe allergy finds trace amounts of tree nuts in your homemade gourmet muffins

- A homemade house cleaner that you sell damaged one of your customer’s entire hardwood floor

- A customer becomes sick with food poisoning after eating old shellfish at your restaurant, goes to the hospital, and incurs medical costs caused by your contaminated food products

- A customer’s pet becomes ill from ingesting some lining in a pet toy product that you sell

In the scenario above, the supermarket is purchasing and reselling house cleaner, which can be covered by product liability insurance.

Public liability insurance is a type of business insurance that covers the cost of claims made by the public that happen in connection with the business activities.

Professional indemnity (PI) insurance is a commercial policy designed to protect business owners, freelancers and the self-employed if clients claim a service is inadequate.

Where the sale of goods is between two businesses in different Contracting States, then it is international and the CISG rules of law automatically apply unless they have been excluded. A contract clause stating that the contract is subject to the legal systems and courts of a particular country overrides or excludes the CISG rules, since the local rules of that country would apply instead.

So the answer should be Canada's legal system.

Consideration only appears in common law countries. Below are some examples of what is and what is not consideration:

- Past consideration is something that has already been done or given. This cannot act as consideration

- Implied consideration: if the detail of a promise to pay is expressed after the provision of goods or services, but there is an implication that such promise would be forthcoming, this may (depending on the facts) be valid consideration.

- A promise given to a third party: this is not normally consideration, and is based on a concept known as privity of contract. Anyone who is not a party to the contract, even if they are beneficiary of it, cannot sue if the terms of the contract are breached.

- A promise to perform over and above an existing obligation: This is always consideration

If a service level agreement is used as a schedule to a contract, it will generally have the following contents:

- Service definitions. If the service information is provided by the specification, SLA should only refer to the specification to avoid any inconsistencies.

- Details on how to measure KPIs, who will measure KPIs

- Minimum requirements or targets

- Remedies if the minimum requirements are not met

Since SLA often lists out the KPI targets, consequences for not meeting the KPI targets and remedies to situation of poor performance, it is a part of performance management.

Direct call off is the act of placing an order under a framework agreement without having further competition.

Standing offer is an available offer.

Blanket order is another name of framework agreement

Closed system is a requirement of framework agreement. It is a system or process that, once started, does not allow new entrants.

Qualitative KPIs are based on pure opinions about how well or otherwise the goods are performing or the service is being delivered. Most often, these will be linked to, or converted into, a numerical measure. However, such satisfaction surveys often also include free fields for respondents to explain why they feel the way they do, and what they might have liked to have been different.

On the other hand, quantitative KPIs are based on numerical measure with either definite number (e.g., actual number of orders incomplete or otherwise inaccurate during the time period) or as a percentage (e.g. number of inaccurate orders as a percentage of the total number of orders).

Openness and co-operation means that supplier is open and co-operative in its relationship with purchaser, e.g., in terms of joint problem solving. This KPI is qualitative since it is measured by individual judgement.

Responsiveness of supplier means the supplier responds rapidly to requests for information and support without having to be chased. It is measured by the number of times requests chased as a percentage of number of requests. It is a quantitative KPI.

Customer satisfactory ratings means the level of customer's satisfaction. This KPI is measured by periodic survey and it is a qualitative KPI.

Cost management is another quantitative KPI. It can be measured by comparing between the actual costs and the contractual costs.

OTIF (one-time in-full) deliveries is a quantitative KPI. It can be measured by counting the inaccurate deliveries in the period or inaccurate deliveries as a percentage of total number of deliveries for period.

Regarding rule of offer and acceptance, there are some differences among legal system around the world. For example, mailbox rule is generally applied in common law countries such as UK, US, Australia,.. while it is ignored in civil law countries. To clarify on rule of offer and acceptance in international trade, offerors may use expressed terms in their offers. These terms known as deemed receipt protocol.

Liquidated damages are an amount of money, agreed upon by the parties at the time of the contract signing, that establishes the damages that can be recovered in the event a party breaches the contract. The amount is supposed to reflect the best estimate of actual damages when the parties sign the contract. These usually apply to a specific type of breach, and in construction, it is frequently the failure to complete work on time.

Liquidated damages clauses are usually written as some sort of formula, for example:

Total Contract Price – [(X amount of $ per day) x (number of days late)]

Including a liquidated damages clause can provide many benefits, the most important of which is predictability. When setting a predetermined amount of damages, it allows both parties a chance to negotiate and settle on a number they both feel is fair and reasonable.

From the owner’s perspective, this acts like a cheap form of insurance against your contractors. In the event of a breach, the owner can immediately calculate the damages without going through the trouble of proving actual damages. Proving actual damages can be a complicated, lengthy, and costly process.

From a contractor perspective, this allows them to analyze the level of risk involved, and schedule appropriately. It also allows them the opportunity to limit the damage claims of the owner.

An invitation to treat is an action inviting other parties to make an offer to form a contract. These actions may sometimes appear to be offers themselves, and the difference can sometimes be difficult to determine. The distinction is important because accepting an offer creates a binding contract while "accepting" an invitation to treat is actually making an offer.

One simple test to distinguish an offer and an invitation to treat is to ask what this statement will become when it is accepted. Now we apply this test to four options:

- Tender bid: Tender bid is submitted by a supplier to an invitation to tender from the buyer. It states the specific quantity, price and other elements. If buyer accepts the bid, there will be a contract between them. Therefore, a tender bid is an offer.

- Purchase order: Purchase order which is sent by a buyer will state the items, the quantity, the price and terms and conditions. If supplier accepts the purchase order, there will also be a contract between two parties. It is also an offer.

- Price list: Price list is prepared by a supplier. The price list often states the items and unit price. If a buyer accepts it, the contract has not yet been formed since the contract scope has not yet been decided. It is an invitation to treat.

- Invoice: Invoice is often sent after a contract is formed. It is in fact a request for payment, neither offer nor invitation to treat.