GMAT Graduate Management Admission Test (2022) Questions and Answers

Parasitic wasps propagate by injecting their eggs into a caterpillar that then becomes paralyzed as the eggs inside develop into wasp larvae. The wasp larvae kill the caterpillar host as they feed on it, form cocoons, and finally develop into wasps. In attempting to discover how such wasps detect the presence of the caterpillar hosts that are so critical to the wasps' propagation, researchers have uncovered an intriguing defense mechanism developed by the plants on which the caterpillars feed.

When chewed on, many plants release volatile compounds from both damaged and undamaged tissues. When these compounds are toxic to the insects that feed on the plants, they can help defend the plants from such attacks. However, the plants on which the wasps' caterpillar hosts feed have evolved an even more complex defense: the caterpillar-infested plants appear to release volatile chemicals that attract parasitic wasps, which then prey on the caterpillars. Scientists originally suspected that the wasps were attracted by an odor, reminiscent of cut grass, that is released as the caterpillar feeds, but a recent study suggests that a different set of volatile attractants is involved. In this study, when researchers used a razor blade to mimic caterpillar damage on the leaves, only grassy odors were emitted, not the volatile compounds that attracted wasps. However, when oral secretions from the caterpillars were applied to these damaged leaves, the leaves released the wasp attractants several hours later. Further tests revealed that oral secretions placed on the razor-damaged leaves stimulated the release of such attractants, making the plants as attractive to wasps as plants that had suffered actual caterpillar damage. These results suggest that chemicals from the caterpillar must be present for these attractants to be released and that unlike the grassy scent, which emanates only as the caterpillar feeds on the plant, the wasp attractants are produced several hours after the attack and persist for several hours, perhaps days. Researchers have launched additional studies to determine whether the wasps' capacity to prey on caterpillars can be enhanced to the extent that the wasps could be used as a natural pesticide to "police" plants and protect them from crop-destroying caterpillars.

Parasitic wasps propagate by injecting their eggs into a caterpillar that then becomes paralyzed as the eggs inside develop into wasp larvae. The wasp larvae kill the caterpillar host as they feed on it, form cocoons, and finally develop into wasps. In attempting to discover how such wasps detect the presence of the caterpillar hosts that are so critical to the wasps' propagation, researchers have uncovered an intriguing defense mechanism developed by the plants on which the caterpillars feed.

When chewed on, many plants release volatile compounds from both damaged and undamaged tissues. When these compounds are toxic to the insects that feed on the plants, they can help defend the plants from such attacks. However, the plants on which the wasps' caterpillar hosts feed have evolved an even more complex defense: the caterpillar-infested plants appear to release volatile chemicals that attract parasitic wasps, which then prey on the caterpillars. Scientists originally suspected that the wasps were attracted by an odor, reminiscent of cut grass, that is released as the caterpillar feeds, but a recent study suggests that a different set of volatile attractants is involved. In this study, when researchers used a razor blade to mimic caterpillar damage on the leaves, only grassy odors were emitted, not the volatile compounds that attracted wasps. However, when oral secretions from the caterpillars were applied to these damaged leaves, the leaves released the wasp attractants several hours later. Further tests revealed that oral secretions placed on the razor-damaged leaves stimulated the release of such attractants, making the plants as attractive to wasps as plants that had suffered actual caterpillar damage. These results suggest that chemicals from the caterpillar must be present for these attractants to be released and that unlike the grassy scent, which emanates only as the caterpillar on the plant, the wasp attractants are produced several hours after the attack and persist for several hours, perhaps days. Researchers have launched additional studies to determine whether the wasps' capacity to prey on caterpillars can be enhanced to the extent that the wasps could be used as a natural pesticide to "police" plants and protect them from crop-destroying caterpillars.

Despite overall physiological bilateral symmetry, many species exhibit

lateralized biases, i.e., preferences for right- or left-oriented behavior. When

approaching prey, for example, some predator species favor their right eye; some

prey species respond more quickly when their left eye detects a predator. Similar

behavioral asymmetries occur in humans. Most notable is right- and lefthandedness; less notable is the tendency to turn right when entering a room.

Paul Farnsworth found that more successful students tended to choose seats near

the front, a little to the right. He argued that external factors such as teacher

location might have affected this lateral bias. But it is now known that processing

differences between the two brain hemispheres can also contribute to behavioral

asymmetries.

George Karev found that when presented with a movie theater seating

diagram, right-handed people were more likely than left-handed people to choose

a seat on the right, facing front. But he hypothesized that, since the right

hemisphere processes visuospatial and emotional information, the people who

chose right-side seats did so because that would put the screen in their left visual

field, optimizing information flow to the right hemisphere.

Although the right hemisphere is thought to be dominant in processing

emotion, some evidence suggests that the left hemisphere plays a role. The

valence model proposes that the left and right hemispheres process positive and

negative emotion respectively, while the approach-withdrawal model posits that

the left hemisphere processes emotion expressed in approach behavior and the

right hemisphere processes emotion expressed in withdrawal behavior.

Victoria Harms and colleagues suggested that since a paper seating plan was

used in the theater-seating studies by Karev and others, the exhibited preference

might be due simply to handedness: people choose the same side of the paper as

their favored hand. Consequently, the Harms research was designed to study

choices in an actual movie theater. Also, hoping to distinguish between various

explanations, they studied seating chaices for comedies (presumed to contain

positive emotional content), dramas (presumed to contain negative emotional

content), and documentaries (presumed to have balanced emotional content).

They found significant—though not universal—preference for seats on the right,

facing front, regardless of movie genre and of handedness.

Despite overall physiological bilateral symmetry, many species exhibit

lateralized biases, i.e., preferences for right- or left-oriented behavior. When

approaching prey, for example, some predator species favor their right eye; some

prey species respond more quickly when their left eye detects a predator. Similar

behavioral asymmetries occur in humans. Most notable is right- and lefthandedness; less notable is the tendency to turn right when entering a room.

Paul Farnsworth found that more successful students tended to choose seats near

the front, a little to the right. He arqued that external factors such as teacher

location might have affected this lateral bias. But it is now known that processing

differences between the two brain hemispheres can also contribute to behavioral

asymmetries.

George Karev found that when presented with a movie theater seating

diagram, right-handed people were more likely than left-handed people to choose

a seat on the right, facing front. But he hypothesized that, since the right

hemisphere processes visuospatial and emotional information, the people who

chose right-side seats did so because that would put the screen in their left visual

field, optimizing information flow to the right hemisphere.

Although the right hemisphere is thought to be dominant in processing

emotion, some evidence suggests that the left hemisphere plays a role. The

valence model proposes that the left and right hemispheres process positive and

negative emotion respectively, while the approach-withdrawal model posits that

the left hemisphere processes emotion expressed in approach behavior and the

right hemisphere processes emotion expressed in withdrawal behavior.

Victoria Harms and colleagues suggested that since a paper seating plan was

used in the theater-seating studies by Karev and others, the exhibited preference

might be due simply to handedness: people choose the same side of the paper as

their favored hand. Consequently, the Harms research was designed to study

choices in an actual movie theater. Also, hoping to distinguish between various

explanations, they studied seating choices for comedies (presumed to contain

positive emotional content), dramas (presumed to contain negative emotional

content), and documentaries (presumed to have balanced emotional content).

They found significant—though not universal—preference for seats on the right,

facing front, regardless of movie genre and of handedness.

Consider a mirage on a hot toad: when light rays hit the hot air just above the surface, they bend. Although light moves through a vacuum at a certain constant speed, it moves more slowly through any transparent medium, such as water or gas. Light travels faster in the thin air near the road than it does in the colder, denser air above, and the difference in speed makes it shift direction as it crosses the boundary between the two. Rays once headed downwards from the sky are redirected to your eye, hiding part of the road with a shimmering image.

A research team has constructed an apparatus to cloak an object from electromagnetic radiation (EMR)—in this case, microwaves—making the object "invisible" to microwave-based detection devices, somewhat as a mirage on a hot road makes the road invisible. The apparatus bends incoming microwaves around the object, using a class of recently created metamaterials—materials that gain certain desired properties directly from their engineered structures rather than from their composition. These metamaterials possess the ability, not found in nature, to bend microwaves at extreme angles. The metamaterial in this case—thin, rigid sheets of fiberglass insulator stamped with conducting loops, coils, and tiny rectangles—was designed to control the movement of incoming EMR.

Mathematical principles of probability entail that for any future event, the probability that it will occur Is at least as great as the probability that both it and some other given event will occur. Consider, for example, the following statements that were shown to subjects in a 1998 study.

X The percentage of adolescent smokers In Texas will decrease at least 15% from current levels by September 1, 1999.

Y The cigarette tax in Texas will increase by $1.00 per pack in 1999.

Z The cigarette tax in Texas will increase by $1.00 per pack in 1999, and the percentage of adolescent smokers in Texas will decrease at least 15% from current levels by September 1, 1999.

Z("Kand X") could not have been more probable than X. Nevertheless, many of the subjects judged Zto be more probable than X. This mistaken form of reasoning, displayed with surprising frequency in various studies in addition to the 1998 study, is known as the "conjunction fallacy."

A number of researchers have offered alternative explanations for the seeming manifestations of the mistake, thus arguing that the fallacy is less widely committed than the various studies would indicate. Some have claimed that research subjects can take "probability" in a sense that does not conform to the mathematical principles of probability. Detailed descriptions of some such conceptions of "probability" have been developed under the names of "confirmation" and "support." Other researchers would claim, correctly, that subjects shown Z(" Kand X") and ^simultaneously will sometimes think of Xas involving the negation of Y—as a claim that the percentage of adolescent smokers in Texas will decrease, but without the $1.00 increase in the cigarette tax.

However, although the subjects in the 1998 study were to consider Xand Z simultaneously, the statements were presented in terms of bets rather than explicit requests for judgments of relative probability. Subjects were asked to choose between Zand X, with a chance of winning $50.00 if the chosen statement turned out to be true. Terms such as "most probable," "likely," etc., were thus avoided, and the interpretation of X\n conjunction with the negation of Kwas thereby eliminated. And with these alternative explanations eliminated, many of the subjects nonetheless bet on Zrather than X:

The following is based on an article published in 2012.

Most linguists believe proto-Indo-European, the ancestor of all Indo-European

languages, was the language of chariot-driving pastoralists who spread through

Eurasia from steppes north of the Black Sea about 4,000 years ago. But a

competing theory is that proto-Indo-European was spoken by farmers in Anatolia

(Asia Minor) about 9,000 years ago, and spread from there along with agriculture.

To evaluate these hypotheses, researchers statistically compared IndoEuropean languages’ vocabularies. Languages with more similar vocabularies are

probably more closely related, sharing more recent common ancestors.

Combining the vocabulary statistics with the known dates when certain languages

split, and with their known geographical ranges, a computer calculated the most

likely relationships among all Indo-European languages and concluded that protoIndo-European probably originated in Anatolia 9,000 years ago.

Disputing this conclusion, skeptics argue that most Indo-European languages

are similar in their words pertaining to chariots and wagons, suggesting protoIndo-European split into daughter languages only after chariots and wagons were

invented. No archaeological evidence indicates that chariots and wagons existed

before 5,500 years ago. Furthermore, proto-Indo-European had words for "horse"

and "bee" and lent many words to proto-Uralic, the mother language of Finnish

and Hungarian. The steppes north of the Black Sea were far closer than Anatolia

to areas where proto-Uralic was spoken, and had more abundant wild horses and

bees.

Many policymakers adopt a macro approach to environmental problems in emerging markets (countries experiencing rapid economic growth): discussing ambitious regulations in global faums and looking to giant multinational companies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for insight. But examining what successful companies in these countries are already doing to make growth more environmentally sustainable may make more sense.

One study identifies several such firms that are turning eco-consciousness into a source of competitive advantage. The most salient quality of these highly profitable companies Is that they turn limitations (of resources, labor, and Infrastructure) into opportunities. An Indian cement company suffering water shortages developed the world's most water-efficient cement-making method, using air-cooling rather than water cooling. A Philippines utility reduced its water loss through wastage and illegal tapping from 63 percent (1997) to 12 percent (2010) by making water more affordable for lower-Income consumers. A Chinese company makes air conditioners powered with buildings' waste heat, reducing strain on the electric grid.

The companies also seek to shape their business environment to support sustainable objectives. Some lobby regulators: a Brazilian organic-sugar producer works with Brazil's government to establish an organic certification system. Some form partnerships: Kenya's Equity Bank allies with international groups to reduce its risks when lending to smallholders or single-family farms; a Brazilian cosmetics company works with suppliers to produce sustainable packaging. Some firms also work to reach and educate lower-income consumers, sacrificing short-term profits to create future markets: a Chilean forestry company organizes local carpenters into networks and connects them to low-income customers.

One could quibble with the study. Switzerland's Phil Rosenzweig has argued that management writers are prone to a halo effect: they treat a company's temporary success as proof that It has discovered some eternal principle of good management. That some successful companies have embraced environmental sustainability does not prove that It makes companies successful. Some firms, having prospered, can afford splurging on green Initiatives; some pursue eco-Initiatives for public relations purposes.

Nonetheless, the study Is thought-provoking. Critics argue that environmentalism Is a rich-world luxury, but such fears are overblown. When natural resources are scarce and consumers are cash-strapped, sustainability can be a lucrative business strategy.

United States Geological Survey scientists have found that a cooling in Pacific

Ocean temperatures led to increases in ecologically threatening phytoplankton

blooms in San Francisco Bay, California. The declining temperatures took place off

the coast of California between 1999 and 2004. The occurrence of these blooms

is surprising because such blooms are normally associated with increases in the

amount of nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, entering estuaries from

such sources as wastewater treatment plants and agricultural fields. In this case,

the bay’s phytoplankton blooms occurred during a period of decreasing nutrient

concentration and inputs.

The scientists discovered the effects of the cold Pacific temperatures by using

biological and water-quality data collected over twenty-five years. The colder

temperatures caused changes in the types, abundance, and migration patterns of

marine life into the San Francisco Bay from coastal ocean waters. For example,

marine life, such as fish, shrimp, and crabs, migrated to the warmer waters that

are found in the bay.

The migrations increased the numbers of predators such as bay shrimp and

Dungeness crabs that eat filter feeders, such as clams. Clams can filter large

quantities of phytoplankton from the bay’s water, which can prevent

phytoplankton blooms. With the increase in predators, there was a corresponding

decrease in clam populations and an increase in phytoplankton.

Answer in box listed

Graphical user interface, text Description automatically generated

Shape Description automatically generated with low confidence

See the answers in box.

See the answers in box.