Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect Salesforce Certified Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (WI25) Questions and Answers

 The Metadata API can be used to migrate configuration changes between two organizations or export current customization in the organization as an xml file. The Metadata API allows developers to retrieve, deploy, create, update, or delete the metadata components that define the structure and behavior of the Salesforce org. The Metadata API cannot perform CRUD operations to manage records in the organization or migrate data changes between two organizations using a csv file. These operations require the use of other APIs, such as the REST API or the Bulk API.

Three areas that should be tested as part of data migration are: data transformation against source system, contact association with correct account, and account and lead ownership. These areas can help ensure that the data is migrated correctly and accurately, and that the relationships and ownership are preserved. Lead assignment is not an area that should be tested as part of data migration, as it is a business process that is triggered after the data is migrated. Page layout assignments is also not an area that should be tested as part of data migration, as it is a configuration setting that is independent of the data. See Data Migration for more details.

The development model that is optimized for this need is to use unlocked packages to deploy the global code and allow each country to create its customized unlocked package extensions. This model can help maintain the global standardization and consistency of the code, while also providing the flexibility and autonomy for each region to customize some aspects of the code for their specific needs. Unlocked packages are a type of second-generation packaging that can be created and installed using the Salesforce CLI or APIs, and can be upgraded or uninstalled as needed. Unlocked package extensions are a type of unlocked packages that can depend on and extend another unlocked package or a managed package. See Unlocked Packages for more details.

Escalating and communicating to stakeholders the risk and mitigating it by allocating additional resources or extending the timeline of the project to support the new requirement based on stakeholders’ input are two actions that should be performed to mitigate the risk. These actions help to manage the scope change and ensure that the project is delivered with the expected quality and functionality.

The best options to enforce code quality in UC’s continuous integration process are to introduce manual code review before deployment to the testing sandbox and to introduce static code analysis before deployment to the testing sandbox. Manual code review can help identify and fix any errors, bugs, or best practices violations in the code. Static code analysis can help check the code quality, complexity, and security using automated tools and standards. Introducing manual code review before deployment to the production org may be too late, as the code may have already caused defects or issues in the testing sandbox. Increasing the size of the testing team assigned to the project may not improve the code quality, as the testing team may not have the skills or authority to review or modify the code. Testing data creation is outside the scope of code quality.

Minor changes should be thoroughly documented and follow some type of standard cadence, as this can help maintain the audit trail and visibility of the changes. All changes should still be tested, even if they are minor, as they can have unexpected impacts on other parts of the system or introduce bugs or security issues. Downstream environments will not be automatically updated when production changes are made, so it is important to have a strategy to keep them in sync and avoid conflicts or overwrites. Minor changes do not need to be documented and can be made at any time is a wrong statement, as it can lead to poor governance and lack of accountability. CI/CD is not required to successfully manage minor changes, although it can help automate and streamline the process. See Application Lifecycle and Deployment for more details.

The development model that the architect should recommend to be used by the consolidated development team is the package development model. This model allows teams to build release artifacts that can be tested and released independently from artifacts for other projects, using unlocked packages or second-generation managed packages. This model can help improve the modularity, reusability, and maintainability of the code and configuration, as well as enable source-driven development and continuous integration and delivery. The org development model is not a good choice for the consolidated development team, as it is based on working directly in an org and using change sets or metadata API tools to deploy changes. This model can lead to conflicts, dependencies, and governance issues, especially when working on multiple projects or with multiple teams. The change set development model is also not a good choice for the consolidated development team, as it is based on using change sets to deploy changes between connected orgs. This model can be slow, error-prone, and limited, as it does not support all metadata types, dependencies, or automation. The package development model does not allow packages to be created and deployed using declarative (point-and-click) development tools, without writing code. This is a wrong statement, as the package development model supports both declarative and programmatic development tools, and requires writing code to create and install packages using the Salesforce CLI or APIs. See Package Development Model for more details.

The most important factor to consider before recommending Performance testing is the number of concurrent transactions, as this will affect the response time and throughput of the system. Option A is not relevant, as unit tests are used to verify the functionality and quality of the code, not the performance. Option B is not related, as Apex Hammer failures are used to check the compatibility of the code with new platform releases, not the performance. Option C is not helpful, as debug log entries are used to troubleshoot errors and issues, not the performance.

The optimized order to load the objects is: accounts, contacts, leads, products, opportunities, opportunity line items. This order follows the dependency and relationship rules among the objects, such as: accounts must be loaded before contacts, as contacts are related to accounts; leads must be loaded before opportunities, as opportunities can be converted from leads; products must be loaded before opportunity line items, as opportunity line items are related to products; and opportunities must be loaded before opportunity line items, as opportunity line items are related to opportunities. See [Data Import Order] for more details.

A suitable branching policy to recommend for multiple development teams that work on separate streams of work, with different timelines, is trunk-based development. This policy allows each team to work on their own feature branches, and merge them to the main branch (trunk) frequently, using pull requests and code reviews. This can help avoid merge conflicts, ensure code quality, and enable continuous integration and delivery. Leaf-based development is not a valid branching policy, as it is a term used to describe the nodes in a tree data structure. GitHub flow is a specific implementation of trunk-based development, but it is not a branching policy by itself. Scratch-org-based development is not a branching policy, but a development model that uses scratch orgs as ephemeral environments. See Trunk-Based Development for more details.

The three benefits of using a partner development org over an individual development org in this scenario are:

Partner development org has a greater number of licenses available for the team. This means that the developers can test their app with different user profiles and permissions, and also invite beta testers to provide feedback2.

Partner development org offers higher API limit. This means that the developers can use more API calls to integrate their app with external systems or services, and also leverage the Salesforce APIs to automate their development and deployment processes2.

Partner development org offers more storage. This means that the developers can store more data and files in their org, and also use more features and components that require storage, such as Big Objects, Platform Events, or Lightning Web Components2.

The other options are not benefits of using a partner development org over an individual development org in this scenario, because:

Only partner development org supports managed beta testing. This is not true, as both partner development org and individual development org can create and distribute managed beta packages3.

Partner development org never expires. This is also not true, as partner development orgs have a 12-month expiration period, which can be extended by request

Designing the right sandbox strategy for the release is a best practice, as it helps to ensure the quality and consistency of the code/configuration across different environments. Regression testing is mandatory for each release, as it helps to verify that the existing functionality is not broken by the new changes. Maintaining a pre/post deployment checklist for each release is a best practice, as it helps to track the tasks and dependencies for each deployment. Release sign-off is not only required for Production, but also for other environments such as UAT and Staging. Publishing a release calendar for each phase of the release is not a best practice, as it may change due to unforeseen circumstances and create confusion.

 The two actions that can effectively contribute to the quality and agility of the team are: Define and follow code standards, and use static code analysis tool in the pipeline before manual code review. Code standards can help ensure consistency, readability, and maintainability of the code, as well as reduce errors and bugs. A static code analysis tool can help automate the code review process and identify any issues or violations of the code standards before the manual review. Choosing the most senior developer to help the technical lead or skipping the code review are not effective actions, as they can lead to more errors and delays.

 Identifying the relevant data and verifying the data integrity can help ensure the quality and accuracy of the migrated data. Using a full sandbox and performing test runs with real data can help validate the migration process and identify any issues or risks.

Using static code analysis to enforce coding standards is the best way to improve consistency among the development teams working on different projects. Static code analysis is a tool that can automatically scan the code and detect any violations of the predefined coding rules and best practices. It can also provide feedback and suggestions to the developers on how to improve their code quality and readability. Creating a Center of Excellence for release management, requiring pull requests to be reviewed by two developers before merging, or executing regression testing before code can be committed are also good practices, but they are not as effective or efficient as static code analysis for ensuring coding consistency.

The advice that a technical architect should provide in a Change Advisory Board meeting is troubleshooting strategies for deployment issues. This is because the Change Advisory Board is responsible for reviewing and approving changes to the IT environment, and the technical architect should provide guidance on how to resolve any potential problems that may arise during the deployment process1. The other options are not relevant for the Change Advisory Board meeting, as they are more related to the requirements analysis, design, or testing phases of the development lifecycle.

Deploying metadata to production orgs using package development model is the best option for the multi-org deployment strategy, as it allows you to create modular and reusable packages that can be easily installed and updated across different orgs. Deploying metadata to production orgs using managed packages is not suitable for this scenario, as managed packages are typically used by ISVs to distribute their applications to customers, and they have some limitations and restrictions that may not fit the requirements of UC. Deploying metadata to production orgs using unmanaged packages is also not a good option, as unmanaged packages are mainly used for one-time distribution of components, and they do not support upgrades or dependencies. Deploying metadata to production orgs using change sets is not feasible for this scenario, as change sets can only be used to deploy metadata between connected orgs in the same Salesforce instance, and UC has separate orgs for each region. See [Package Development Model] for more details.

The architect should suggest the following actions to help UC discover the failing unit tests earlier: Train the administrators to make their changes in a special “admin changes” sandbox, and then promote to production, and ensure a metadata backup is committed to version control every day and a diff published to the release team. Training the administrators to use a sandbox can help prevent direct changes to production that can break the code or the unit tests. Ensuring a metadata backup and a diff can help identify any changes that have been made to production and compare them with the source of truth.

To move to the package development model, the administrator must enable both the Dev Hub and the Second-Generation Managed Packages in setup. The Dev Hub is the main org where the administrator can create and manage scratch orgs and packages. The Second-Generation Managed Packages are the new format of packages that support modular development and versioning. The Unlocked Packages are a type of second-generation packages that are not tied to a namespace and can be installed and customized in any org. The Source Tracking for Scratch Orgs is a feature that allows the administrator to track the changes made in a scratch org and push or pull them to or from a source repository.

The deployment script will fail because the new field is not known for the previous API version 35. The Metadata API version determines which components and fields are available for deployment. If a component or field is introduced in a later API version than the one used for deployment, it will not be recognized and will cause an error.

 D is the correct answer, as utilizing automated source control, test, and build systems to test and deploy to production can help to maintain quality and reduce the risk of bugs being introduced to production. Automated systems can ensure that the code is consistent, version-controlled, tested, and validated before deploying to production. A is incorrect, as requiring developers to deploy completed code and unit tests directly to production can introduce errors and conflicts, as well as bypass the testing and validation stages. B is incorrect, as deploying all functionality together can create complexity and dependency issues, as well as delay the release of completed features. C is incorrect, as using a spreadsheet to track approved changes that should be released with change sets can be prone to human errors and inconsistencies, as well as lack of automation and integration. You can learn more about this topic in the Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery module on Trailhead.

A workflow and a trigger are considered minor changes that do not require alignment with a Salesforce major or patch release. However, they still need proper testing, training, and change management before being deployed to production. Therefore, the architect should plan this as a minor release with training and change management.

Mock objects are needed when writing test classes to simulate the behavior of real objects or external services that are not available or accessible in the test context. Using a Mock allows the test class to bypass the dependencies of other objects, methods, state, or behaviors, and therefore, the developer has total control of their own code. This is especially useful when the code makes an HTTP callout, as the test class cannot actually call an external web service. A Mock is needed to provide a fake response for the HTTP callout. A Mock is not needed for the classes that extend the batchable interface, as the test class can use the Test.startTest and Test.stopTest methods to execute the batch jobs synchronously. A Mock is not a shortcut for bypassing long running processes, as the test class should still test the functionality and performance of the code.

A Center of Excellence is a mechanism that can help to increase the use of standard Salesforce functionality, by defining and managing best practices, standards, and governance across the organization. A Center of Excellence can also facilitate cross-functional collaboration, knowledge sharing, and alignment of Salesforce initiatives with business goals. A Change Control Board is a group of stakeholders that reviews and approves changes to the system, but does not necessarily promote the use of standard Salesforce functionality. A Requirements Traceability Matrix is a document that links requirements to their sources and test cases, but does not necessarily increase the use of standard Salesforce functionality. A Project Management Office is a group that oversees the execution of projects, but does not necessarily increase the use of standard Salesforce functionality.

The advantages of the package development model are improving team development and collaboration, facilitating automated testing and continuous integration, and significantly reducing the need for manually tracking changes. The package development model allows the developers to work on modular and reusable components that can be easily tested and deployed. The package development model does not eliminate the need of using change sets, as they can still be used for deploying non-packaged components or metadata. The package development model does not provide its own source control, but rather relies on external source control systems such as Git.

 Testers will experience functional changes throughout testing due to not having isolation from development. Using a single developer sandbox for both development and testing is not a good practice, as it does not provide a stable and consistent environment for testing. The developers may make changes to the code or configuration that affect the functionality or behavior of the application, which may cause the testers to encounter unexpected results or errors.

 The Metadata API is mainly used for file-based deployment, such as deploying an application from a Developer Edition org to the AppExchange, or from a sandbox org to a production org. The Ant Migration Tool is a wrapper around the Metadata API, so it is not a direct use case for writing code to call retrieve() and deploy() methods. The Salesforce CLI (SFDX) uses the Source-Driven Development model, which relies on the source code as the source of truth, rather than the Metadata API.

These are the correct answers because they are related to the data quality and integrity of the migrated data. Case association, case ownership, and data transformation are all important aspects of data migration that should be tested. Case assignment rules and escalation rules are not directly related to data migration, but rather to the business logic and workflow of the application. Page layout assignment is also not related to data migration, but rather to the user interface and security of the application.

The fastest approach to spin off a sandbox with up to 10,000 records in each object for testing the integration performance is to spin off a partial copy sandbox using a sandbox template with all the objects required for testing the integration. A partial copy sandbox can copy up to 10,000 records per object using a sandbox template that specifies the objects and fields to copy. A partial copy sandbox can also copy the metadata and the configuration settings from the production org. A developer pro sandbox, a development sandbox, or a full copy sandbox may not be able to copy enough data for testing the integration performance, as they have lower data storage limits. A developer pro sandbox and a development sandbox can only copy 1 GB of data, while a full copy sandbox can only copy 5 GB of data. A full copy sandbox may also take longer to spin-off, as it copies all the data and metadata from the production org.

 DOM changes introduced by a release can cause automated browser tests to need updating, as they can affect the way the browser interacts with the web page elements and the selectors used to identify them. New standard fields, metadata schema changes, and new Apex methods are not likely to affect automated browser tests, as they are mostly related to the backend functionality and data model of Salesforce. See [Automated Browser Testing] for more details.

 In the Metadata API, the External Object metadata type represents external objects. In the Metadata API, the Custom Object metadata type represents external objects.

 D is the correct answer, as the risk with this plan is that multiple work-streams with dependencies could impact the go-live. If the legacy system upgrade and the new integration are not aligned and coordinated, there could be delays, errors, or failures in the project delivery. A is incorrect, as the deadline being scheduled during a Salesforce release is not a risk, but an opportunity to leverage the new features and enhancements that Salesforce provides. B is incorrect, as the project team using the Waterfall methodology is not a risk, but a choice that depends on the project scope, complexity, and requirements. C is incorrect, as the legacy system team using an Agile methodology is not a risk, but a choice that depends on the project scope, complexity, and requirements. You can learn more about the risk management in the Project Management Strategies for Salesforce Implementations module on Trailhead.

To track Salesforce metadata throughout the development lifecycle across sandboxes and production, the architect should recommend using an AppExchange or third-party tool that is specialized in Salesforce deployment. These tools can provide features such as version control, dependency analysis, automated testing, and rollback capabilities. Using an Excel sheet to track deployment steps and document the SFDX commands is not a reliable or scalable solution, as it is prone to human errors and does not provide any automation or validation. Using ChangeSet to track deployed customizations is also not a good option, as ChangeSet is limited in the types of metadata it can deploy and does not support versioning or dependency management. Using Salesforce SFDX commands to deploy to different sandboxes is a possible solution, but it requires a high level of technical expertise and does not provide a graphical interface or reporting capabilities.

 Sandboxes should be refreshed based on the needs of the project and the development lifecycle. Production is the only pristine environment, so it is a good practice to refresh sandboxes from production regularly to ensure data and metadata consistency. Integration sandboxes should be refreshed frequently, not rarely, to avoid conflicts and errors when integrating code from multiple developers. Development environments should generally be refreshed after each working feature has been successfully migrated, to avoid accumulating unnecessary changes and to start fresh for the next feature.

: Storing the records in sandboxes and production is not a good practice, as it can lead to data inconsistencies and conflicts. Storing the records in a version control system is a better option, as it allows tracking changes and deploying them to different environments. Using a third-party product to manage these records is also a valid option, as it can provide features such as data backup, restore, and migration.

Following an ALM process can help avoid defects from being deployed to production, by ensuring that the code is tested and validated in different environments before reaching the end users. It can also help release new features on a consistent schedule, by establishing a clear roadmap and timeline for the development and deployment phases. Moreover, it can help prevent existing working functionality from stopping, by implementing backup and rollback strategies, as well as monitoring and troubleshooting tools. Training new users after each minor and major release is not a benefit of ALM, but rather a best practice for user adoption and change management. Defining metrics for application development project success is not a benefit of ALM, but rather a part of the project management and evaluation process.

The benefits of managing change with Packaged Development are:

Versioning to help with change management, as it allows the developers to track the changes made to the metadata and roll back to previous versions if needed.

Making the release cycle more efficient and agile, as it enables the developers to deploy smaller and more frequent updates to the orgs, reducing the risk of errors and conflicts.

Modular development process with specification of dependencies among packages, as it allows the developers to break down the metadata into logical units that can be reused and updated independently, while ensuring that the dependencies are resolved correctly. Managing the number of sandboxes needed to successfully deploy is not a benefit of Packaged Development, as it is more related to the sandbox strategy and the development model. Clearly dividing developers and testers is also not a benefit of Packaged Development, as it is more related to the team structure and the testing strategy.

 Scratch orgs are the best development environments for the package development model, as they allow developers to start a new project, start a new feature branch, or start automated testing in a disposable and configurable org. Scratch orgs also track all the changes automatically and can be easily integrated with version control systems. Scratch orgs can coexist with other models, such as the org development model, but this is not the main reason to start using them. Dev sandboxes are not suitable for the package development model, as they are not within the code deployment path and they do not support source-driven development.

 Using a Change Set or manually replicating the changes in the developer sandbox are both valid approaches to ensure that changes made in production are reflected in the sandbox that the developers are working on. Refreshing the developer sandbox would overwrite any changes made by the developers, and Salesforce-to-Salesforce is not a deployment tool.

 In the change set model, the source of truth is a combination of the metadata already in the environment and the content of your change set, as you stated correctly. However, a change set cannot be retrieved from the developer’s workbench as a package, nor can it be pushed into the version control system. Change sets are only available within the Salesforce UI, and they are not compatible with version control systems. In the package development model, the source of truth is the metadata in the package project, which makes it easy to integrate to a version control system, as you stated correctly. Additionally, in the package development model, the best practice is to consider the dependencies and build them into the package so it can be deployed in any other target orgs. This ensures that the package is self-contained and does not rely on external components that may not exist in the target org.

 DevPro1 cannot be cloned because it is on a different version from Production, as it was upgraded to preview for the next Salesforce major release two weeks ago. Therefore, the architect should recommend creating a new DevPro2, and migrating metadata from DevPro1. This way, the second work stream can work on the Service Cloud requirements in a separate sandbox, without affecting the Sales Cloud dev team. Asking the second work stream team to work on the same DevPro1 sandbox would create conflicts and dependencies between the two teams, and would not allow them to release at different times. Pushing back on the requirements because adding another work stream will bring some risks with it would not be a good option, as the business needs might be urgent and important.

 This is the correct answer because the executive sponsor is the senior leader who provides strategic direction, funding, and support for the project. The executive sponsor is also responsible for approving any changes to the project scope, budget, or timeline that may affect the project outcomes or benefits.

The best way to migrate from a managed package to an unlocked package is to split the components into two packages: one for the objects and fields, and one for the classes, Visualforce, and other components. This way, the data and integrations with the objects and fields of the managed package are preserved, and the classes and Visualforce can be modified and deployed using CI/CD processes with the unlocked package. Exporting and restoring the data from the managed package is not a feasible solution, as it would require a lot of effort and risk data loss or corruption. Installing the unlocked package with the same namespace as the managed package is not possible, as namespaces are unique and cannot be reused. Staying with the managed package is not a good option, as it does not allow for better integration with CI/CD processes.

 A and C are the advantages of using an Agile Project Management tool, as they provide visibility into the project progress and status, and consolidate the project artifacts in a common repository. B is not an advantage of using an Agile Project Management tool, as it depends on the communication and collaboration skills of the team members and stakeholders. D is not an advantage of using an Agile Project Management tool, as it is more related to the governance framework and methodology of the project

The best option is to ensure the sandbox will be on the release preview, which means it will be upgraded to the new platform release before the production environment. This will allow the team to test the deployment in a realistic scenario and catch any potential issues. Option A is not ideal, as the staging and production support sandboxes will not be on the same platform version as the production environment. Option C is also not ideal, as the production support sandbox will not be on the same platform version as the production environment. Option D is risky, as the staging sandbox refresh may not complete in time for the go-live.

Test classes should execute under various profiles to ensure that the code works for different user permissions and sharing settings. Test data must have positive as well as negative data to cover all possible scenarios and edge cases.

 In the post refresh plan, modifying external ids to a known valid set of values for UAT is the best way to resolve the issue of objects that have external ids from production no longer pointing to valid external ids in the UAT environment. This way, the data integrity and consistency across the integrated systems can be maintained. Letting UAT point to production integrations and rolling back each transaction after it finishes is not a good practice, as it can cause data loss or corruption in production. Deleting all the data and using an automated testing tool to create new data across all the systems in UAT is not feasible, as it can take a lot of time and resources. Masking the external id so nobody can see the production value is not a solution, as it does not address the underlying problem of invalid references.

A virtual Kanban board tool is a good way to increase transparency and collaboration among agile development teams, as it allows them to visualize their work, track their progress, and identify any bottlenecks or issues. A daily stand-up meeting, a daily email, or a shared spreadsheet are not as effective or efficient as a Kanban board tool.

 The best option for UC given the scenario is to opt for a multi-org strategy, where each org can have its own sales process, common rules, and operate in locale. A multi-org strategy can accommodate the different languages, sales processes, and legal requirements of the two business units. A multi-org strategy can also allow for more innovation and flexibility, as each org can customize and optimize its own functionality. A single-org strategy may not be able to support the different languages, sales processes, and legal requirements of the two business units. A single-org strategy may also limit the innovation and flexibility, as the org has to follow a standardized and consistent approach.

This is the correct answer because having developers work in separate branches and merge their changes in a common branch for testing can reduce the risk of overwriting others’ changes and ensure code quality and consistency. Having all developers work in the same branch or in the HEAD may cause conflicts and errors. Not using source control is not a good practice and may result in data loss and lack of version control.

Deploying unsupported components manually before/after deployment is the best way to address the issue of Metadata API not supporting all the components yet. Metadata API is a powerful tool for deploying changes between orgs, but it does not cover all the metadata types that are available in Salesforce. Some examples of unsupported components are email templates, dashboards, reports, and custom settings. These components need to be deployed manually by using other tools or methods, such as change sets, data loader, or manual configuration.

A and B are the correct answers, as installing an Aloha certified app and upgrading to an Enterprise Edition org are the best solutions to enable advanced quoting in the current Professional Edition org. An Aloha certified app is an app that does not count against the org limits, such as objects and tabs, and can provide additional functionality and features. Upgrading to an Enterprise Edition org can increase the org limits, as well as provide access to more customization and automation options. C is incorrect, as creating and installing an unmanaged package is not a good solution, as it will consume the org limits and may not provide the desired functionality. D is incorrect, as buying more user licenses will not increase the org limits, but only the number of users who can access the org. You can learn more about this topic in the Salesforce Editions and Limits module on Trailhead.

A change to a multi-org strategy can be justified by two reasons: launching a new line of business with independent processes and acquiring a company that has its own Salesforce org and operates in a different business with its own set of regulatory requirements. These reasons indicate that the single-org strategy is no longer feasible or optimal, as it would require too much customization, complexity, and compliance. Using Chatter for collaboration among different business units is not a reason to change to a multi-org strategy, as Chatter can work across multiple orgs. Following a unification enterprise architecture operating model is also not a reason to change to a multi-org strategy, as this model implies having orgs with the same processes implemented for each business unit, which is more suitable for a single-org strategy.

Facilitating the design of a prioritization model with the stakeholders is the best way to overcome the problem of having many backlog items and competing stakeholders who cannot agree on priority. A prioritization model is a framework that helps the stakeholders evaluate and rank the backlog items based on various criteria, such as value, urgency, effort, risk, etc. By using a prioritization model, the stakeholders can have a clear and objective way of deciding which items are more important and should be done first. Organizing a sprint planning meeting, taking over prioritization, or allowing the delivery teams to pick the work are not effective solutions, as they do not address the root cause of the problem or involve the stakeholders in the decision-making process.

The correct statement for the Staging sandbox in the diagram is that when created or refreshed, the Staging sandbox is a full replica of Production, as it is a full copy sandbox that copies all the data and metadata from the production org. Option B is not true, as the Staging sandbox is not automatically refreshed, but manually refreshed by the administrator. Option C is not true, as Salesforce major releases may occur in Staging and Production at different times, depending on the sandbox preview window. Option D is not true, as the Staging environment can be updated more frequently than once every two weeks, depending on the sandbox refresh interval.

The Executive Steering Committee is the management team that is empowered to approve additional budget requirements for a project, as they are responsible for providing strategic direction, oversight, and governance for the project. The Security Review Committee is responsible for ensuring that the project meets the security standards and policies of the organization. The Project Management Committee is responsible for managing the day-to-day activities and deliverables of the project. The Change Control Board is responsible for reviewing and approving any changes to the project scope, schedule, or resources.

 A and C are the characteristics of an effective communication plan, as they enable feedback, collaboration, and transparency among the stakeholders. B is not a characteristic of an effective communication plan, as it does not account for changes in the stakeholder list or their communication preferences. D is not a characteristic of an effective communication plan, as it limits the information sharing and trust among the stakeholders.

 To support application lifecycle methodology, you need tools that can help you manage the source code, automate the deployment process, and track the issues and bugs. A version control repository is a tool that allows you to store, track, and collaborate on the source code of your application. A continuous integration tool is a tool that allows you to automate the deployment of your code to different environments, as well as run tests and validations. An issue tracking tool is a tool that allows you to record, monitor, and resolve the issues and bugs that arise during the development and testing phases. A database management system is a tool that allows you to store, manipulate, and query data, but it is not directly related to application lifecycle methodology. A middleware is a software layer that facilitates communication and data exchange between different applications, but it is not directly related to application lifecycle methodology either.

A product owner is responsible for defining the scope and prioritizing the backlog of the project. A product owner can help the COE manage the scope creep between the different projects by aligning the business goals and ensuring the value delivery. A scrum master, a release manager, and a change manager are not directly involved in scope management.

 Using a Source Control system alongside a multi-sandbox development strategy has several advantages, such as performing code reviews before promoting to a pre-production sandbox, keeping a history of changes made by each developer, and creating a branching strategy that tracks each feature or change separately. Automatically deploying changes from sandbox to production is not an advantage of Source Control, but rather a function of a Continuous Integration tool. Acting as a backup in case of catastrophic data loss is not an advantage of Source Control, but rather a benefit of having a sandbox strategy.

These are the correct answers because they are essential components of a governance framework that helps to manage the changes and enhancements to the Salesforce application. Requirements management is the process of capturing, analyzing, prioritizing, and tracking the business needs and requests. Change control log is the tool that records and tracks the status of all change requests and approvals. Documentation repository is the central place that stores and organizes all the project artifacts and deliverables. Automated testing and continuous integration are not necessary components of a governance framework, but rather best practices for ensuring the quality and reliability of the code and configuration.

Pairing with the administrator and reviewing each change as it happens is the best way to handle the situation of discovering a Sev0 defect in production. This way, the architect can ensure that the changes are done correctly and quickly, without compromising the quality or security of the application. The architect can also provide guidance and feedback to the administrator, as well as monitor the impact and outcome of the changes. Denying the suggestion, explaining that only developers are certified to make changes, or calling the security team are not advisable actions, as they can delay the resolution of the defect, increase the damage, or create unnecessary conflict.

Load testing is the type of testing that will help UC measure the page response time. Load testing simulates the expected number of concurrent users and measures how the system performs under normal load conditions. Unit testing, system integration testing, and stress testing are not designed to measure the page response time.

User fields are preserved during metadata deployments and Salesforce attempts to locate a matching user in the target org during deployment. If the username in the source org doesn’t exist in the target org, the deployment will stop until the usernames are resolved or removed.