212-89 EC Council Certified Incident Handler (ECIH v3) Questions and Answers

Email Dossier is a tool designed to assist in the investigation of email incidents by analyzing and validating email headers and providing detailed information about the origin, routing, and authenticity of an email. When Michael is tasked with handling an email incident and needs to check the validity of an email received from an unknown source, Email Dossier can be utilized to trace the email's path, assess its credibility, and identify potential red flags associated with phishing or other malicious email-based attacks.

References:The ECIH v3 curriculum emphasizes the importance of tools and techniques for email incident handling, including the use of Email Dossier for investigating suspicious emails and aiding in the response to email-based threats.

The vulnerability exploited by Clark through tampering with form and parameter values to gain unauthorized access to information assets is indicative of Broken Access Control. Broken Access Control vulnerabilities occur when a web application does not properly enforce restrictions on what authenticated users are allowed to do. Attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities to access unauthorized functionality or data, such as accessing other users' accounts, viewing sensitive files, and modifying other users’ data.

The correct sequence to examine the originating IP address of emails involves first accessing the email's header to locate the IP address, then using external resources to investigate that address further. The steps are as follows:

• Step 2:Open the email to trace and find its header. This is the initial step because the header contains valuable information about the email's journey across the internet, including the originating IP address.
• Step 3:Collect the IP address of the sender from the header of the received mail. This detail is crucial for the next steps in the investigation.
• Step 1:Search for the IP in the WHOIS database. This database can provide information about the owner of the IP address, including the ISP and sometimes the geographic location.
• Step 4:Look for the geographic address of the sender in the WHOIS database. With the IP address information obtained from the WHOIS search, the geographic location or the originating country of the email can often be deduced, contributing to the analysis of the email's legitimacy.

References:The process of analyzing email headers to trace originating IP addresses and further investigating those addresses is a common practice in incident response, covered under the digital forensics and email analysis topics within the ECIH v3 curriculum by EC-Council.

Forensic readiness refers to an organization's ability to maximize its capability to use digital evidence effectively in an investigation, while minimizing the cost of an investigation and disruption to its operations. It involves having policies, procedures, and technologies in place to collect, preserve, and analyze digital evidence efficiently, so when an incident occurs, the organization is prepared to handle it quickly and with minimal costs. Forensic readiness not only helps in reducing the time and resources spent on investigations but also ensures that the evidence is reliable and can be used in legal proceedings if necessary.References:The concept of forensic readiness is part of the Incident Handler (ECIH v3) curriculum, emphasizing the strategic importance of preparing for incidents in advance, including the preservation of evidence and the ability to conduct effective and efficient investigations.

Anti-forensics techniques are designed to prevent, mislead, or interfere with the incident handling process, affecting the collection, preservation, and identification phases of the forensic investigation process. These techniques include methods to erase, encrypt, or alter information, make data recovery difficult, hide data (e.g., steganography), or otherwise obstruct forensic analysis and investigation efforts. Anti-forensics can significantly challenge the efforts of incident responders and forensic investigators in establishing the facts of a security incident or crime.References:The Incident Handler (ECIH v3) courses and study guides discuss various challenges in digital forensics, including anti-forensics methods and their impact on the effectiveness of forensic investigations.

Top of Form

The responsibility of first responders does not include shutting down or rebooting the victim’s computer as a measure to preserve temporary and fragile evidence. In fact, such actions can potentially alter or destroy volatile data that could be crucial for the investigation. The primary responsibilities of first responders include protecting and identifying the crime scene, and ensuring the preservation of evidence in its original state as much as possible, which may involve isolating affected systems from the network but not necessarily shutting them down or rebooting them without proper forensic readiness and consideration.

In the scenario described, Dickson is performing an active assessment. This type of vulnerability assessment involves using automated tools to actively scan and probe the network for identifying hosts, services, and vulnerabilities. Unlike passive assessments, which rely on monitoring network traffic without direct interaction with the targets, active assessments engage directly with the network infrastructure to discover vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and other security issues by sending data to systems and analyzing the responses. This approach provides a more immediate and detailed view of the security posture but can also generate detectable traffic that might be noticed by defensive systems or affect the performance of live systems.

References:The ECIH v3 curriculum by EC-Council includes discussions on various methods of conducting vulnerability assessments, highlighting the differences between active and passive techniques, as well as the contexts in which each is most appropriately used.

Volatile data refers to information that is stored temporarily and is lost when a computer is turned off or restarted, such as RAM contents, including open sockets and open ports, the date and time of the system, and the state of the network interface. The creation dates of files, however, are considered non-volatile data because they are preserved on the hard drive and remain available after the system is restarted or turned off. Non-volatile data is stored on persistent storage mediums like hard drives, SSDs, and magnetic tapes, where it remains until it is deleted or overwritten.References:The Incident Handler (ECIH v3) certification emphasizes the distinction between volatile and non-volatile data in the context of digital forensics and incident response, highlighting the importance of understanding what data may be lost upon system shutdown and what data persists.

Threat correlation is a method used by incident responders to analyze and associate various indicators of compromise (IoCs) and alerts to identify genuine threats. By correlating data from multiple sources and applying intelligence to distinguish between unrelated events and coordinated attack patterns, responders can significantly reduce the rate of false-positive alerts. This enables teams to prioritize their efforts on the most critical and likely threats, thereby reducing potential risks and corporate liabilities. Effective threat correlation involves the use of sophisticated security information and event management (SIEM) systems, threat intelligence platforms, and analytical techniques to identify relationships between seemingly disparate security events and alerts.

References:The role of threat correlation in improving the efficiency of incident response activities by reducing false positives and focusing on high-priority issues is outlined in various cybersecurity frameworks and incident response guides, including those related to the ECIH v3 certification. These resources emphasize the importance of applying context and intelligence to security alerts to accurately identify and respond to genuine threats.

The correct sequence of steps performed by incident responders during the vulnerability assessment phase is as follows:

• Perform OSINT information gathering to validate the vulnerabilities (4):Initially, Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) is used to gather information about the organization’s digital footprint and potential vulnerabilities.
• Run vulnerability scans using tools (1):Next, specialized tools are employed to scan the organization's networks and systems for vulnerabilities.
• Identify and prioritize vulnerabilities (2):The identified vulnerabilities are then analyzed and prioritized based on their severity and potential impact on the organization.
• Examine and evaluate physical security (3):Physical security assessments are also crucial as they can impact the overall security posture and protection of digital assets.
• Check for misconfigurations and human errors (6):This step involves looking for misconfigurations in systems and networks, as well as potential human errors that could lead to vulnerabilities.
• Apply business and technology context to scanner results (5):The results from the scans are evaluated within the context of the business and its technology environment to accurately assess risks.
• Create a vulnerability scan report (7):Finally, a comprehensive report is created, detailing the vulnerabilities, their severity, and recommended mitigation strategies.

This sequence ensures a thorough assessment, prioritizing vulnerabilities that pose the greatest risk and providing actionable insights for mitigation.References:ECIH v3 courses and study guides elaborate on the vulnerability assessment process, detailing the steps involved in identifying, evaluating, and addressing security vulnerabilities within an organization's IT infrastructure.

In the context of collecting physical evidence during a cyber forensic investigation, Patrick must consider items like removable media, cables, and publications. These items can contain crucial information related to the crime, such as data storage devices (USB drives, external hard drives), cables connected to potentially relevant devices, and any printed materials that might have information or clues about the incident. Open ports, services, and OS vulnerabilities, DNS information, and published name servers and web application source code, while important in digital forensics, do not constitute physical evidence in the traditional sense.References:Incident Handler (ECIH v3) study guides and courses detail the process of evidence collection in cyber forensic investigations, emphasizing the importance of securing physical evidence that could support digital forensic analysis.

Thenetstat -ancommand is used to display network connections, routing tables, and a number of network interface statistics. It is particularly useful for identifying unusual volumes of traffic to and from a system, which can be indicative of a DoS/DDoS attack. The option-ashows all active connections and the TCP and UDP ports on which the computer is listening, and-ndisplays addresses and port numbers in numerical form. This can help the incident handling and response (IH&R) team to identify suspicious patterns, such as a large number of connections from a single source or to a specific port, which are common during DoS/DDoS attacks.

References:The Certified Incident Handler (ECIH v3) program from EC-Council teaches incident handlers about various manual and automated techniques to detect and respond to incidents, including the use of system and network commands likenetstat -anfor identifying signs of DoS/DDoS attacks.

A TCP Xmas scan is a type of network scanning technique used by attackers to identify open ports on a target machine. The name "Xmas" comes from the set of flags that are turned on within the packet, making it 'lit up like a Christmas tree'. Specifically, the FIN, PSH, and URG flags are set, which corresponds to the hexadecimal value 0X029 in the TCP header's flags field. Wireshark, a popular network protocol analyzer, allows users to create custom filters to detect specific types of network traffic, including malicious scanning attempts. By using the filtertcp.flags==0X029, Rose can detect packets that have these specific flags set, indicating a potential TCP Xmas scan attempt.

References:The technique of using Wireshark to detect specific types of scans, including the TCP Xmas scan, is covered in cybersecurity training materials and documentation related to network analysis and incident handling, such as those associated with the ECIH certification.

By classifying and encrypting customer Personally Identifiable Information (PHI), you are specifically guarding against the risk of Sensitive Data Exposure. This OWASP security risk involves the accidental or unlawful exposure of protected data to unauthorized individuals. Encryption serves as a critical defense mechanism by ensuring that, even if data is accessed without authorization, it remains unintelligible and useless to the attacker without the decryption keys. Data classification further supports this by identifying which data is sensitive and requires such protections, ensuring that appropriate security controls are applied to prevent exposure.References:OWASP Top 10, a widely respected document that outlines the most critical web application security risks, identifies Sensitive Data Exposure as a key risk area. Incident Handler (ECIH v3) courses and study guides often refer to the OWASP Top 10 to explain common web security risks and appropriate countermeasures, including the importance of encrypting sensitive data.

In the scenario described, Stanley aims to ensure that the digital evidence he collected is admissible in court. This means the evidence must be gathered, handled, and presented in a manner that complies with legal standards, ensuring it can be legally used in a trial. Admissibility is a crucial characteristic of digital evidence, as it must be relevant, authentic, and obtained without violating any laws or rights to privacy. The evidence must also be presented in a clear and comprehensible manner to be understood by the members of the jury, which further supports its admissibility in court.References:The Incident Handler (ECIH v3) certification materials cover the legal aspects of handling digital evidence, including the principles ensuring evidence is admissible in court.

The correct sequence of steps involved in forensic readiness planning, based on the activities described, is as follows:

• Identify the potential evidence required for an incident.
• Determine the source of the evidence.
• Define a policy that determines the pathway to legally extract electronic evidence with minimal disruption.
• Establish a policy for securely handling and storing the collected evidence.
• Identify if the incident requires full or formal investigation.
• Train the staff to handle the incident and preserve the evidence.
• Create a special process for documenting the procedure.
• Establish a legal advisory board to guide the investigation process.This sequence ensures that an organization is prepared to handle incidents efficiently, with a focus on identifying relevant evidence and the legal context of its collection, followed by staff training and the establishment of guiding policies and advisory boards.References:Incident Handler (ECIH v3) courses and study guides include discussions on forensic readiness planning, highlighting the importance of preparing organizations for effective legal and technical handling of incidents.

Email-bombing refers to the attack where the attacker sends a massive volume of emails to a specific email address or mail server in order to overflow the mailbox or overwhelm the server, potentially causing it to fail or deny service to legitimate users. This attack can disrupt communications and, in some cases, lead to the targeted email account being disabled. Masquerading involves pretending to be another legitimate user, spoofing is the creation of emails (or other communications) with a forged sender address, and a smurf attack is a specific type of Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack that exploits Internet Protocol (IP) and Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) to flood a target with traffic. Email-bombing specifically targets email services with the goal of causing disruption by overflowing inboxes.References:ECIH v3 courses and study guides often include discussions on various attack vectors used by cybercriminals, including email-based threats and their impact on organizational security.

Nation-state attribution involves identifying a specific country or government as the sponsor behind a cyber-attack or intrusion. This type of threat attribution is focused on determining the involvement of state actors in cyber operations against specific targets, which often involves sophisticated, well-planned, and executed cyber campaigns. Alexis's efforts to identify and attribute the actors behind the attack to a specific nation-state fall under this category, as she seeks to uncover the geopolitical motives and the extent of state sponsorship behind the incident. Nation-state attribution requires analyzing a variety of indicators, including technical evidence, tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), and contextual intelligence. This is distinct from campaign attribution, which focuses on linking attacks to a specific campaign or operation, true attribution, which aims at identifying the actual individuals behind an attack, and intrusion set attribution, which involves attributing a set of malicious activities to a particular threat actor or group.References:The Incident Handler (ECIH v3) certification program includes discussions on various types of threat attributions, highlighting the challenges and methodologies involved in attributing cyber-attacks to specific actors, including nation-states.

Splunk is a powerful tool for log analysis, capable of collecting, analyzing, and visualizing data from various sources in real time. For an incident handler like Drake, intending to detect traces of malicious activities within the network infrastructure, Splunk can efficiently parse large volumes of log data, enabling the identification of patterns and anomalies that may indicate malware propagation or other security incidents. Its real-time analysis capabilities make it an ideal tool for monitoring network activities and responding to incidents promptly.

In the context of incident handling and response (IH&R), the preparation phase is the initial step where teams and resources are organized to effectively respond to potential security incidents. This phase involves building the IH&R team, developing incident response plans and policies, setting up communication channels, and ensuring that the team has the necessary tools and authority to act. James, being assigned to build an IH&R plan and organize his team, is engaging in the preparation step of the incident response process. This foundational step is crucial for ensuring a coordinated and efficient response to incidents when they occur.

References:The importance of the preparation phase in the incident response lifecycle is emphasized in various cybersecurity frameworks and guidelines, including those covered in ECIH v3 certification materials, which detail the roles, responsibilities, and planning necessary to establish an effective incident response capability.

The port scanning technique that involves resetting the TCP connection between the client and server abruptly before the completion of the three-way handshake, thereby leaving the connection half-open, is known as a Stealth scan (also referred to as a SYN scan). This technique allows the scanner to inquire about the status of a port without establishing a full TCP connection, making the scan less detectible to intrusion detection systems and lesslikely to be logged by the target. It's a method used to discreetly discover open ports on a target machine without establishing a full connection that would be visible in logs.References:ECIH v3 certification materials often cover different types of network scanning techniques, including Stealth scans, explaining their methodologies, purposes, and how they can be detected or mitigated.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF or XSRF) is an attack that tricks the victim's browser into executing unauthorized actions on a website where they are currently authenticated. In this scenario, the attacker exploits the trust that a site has in the user's browser, effectively forcing the browser to perform actions without the user's knowledge or consent. For example, if the user is logged into their bank's website, an attacker could craft a malicious request to transfer funds without the user's direct interaction. CSRF attacks rely on authenticated sessions and typically target state-changing requests to compromise user or application data.

References:The Certified Incident Handler (ECIH v3) curriculum by EC-Council discusses various web-based attacks, including CSRF, detailing their mechanisms, implications, and preventive measures to safeguard against such threats.

If a hacker influences an employee or a disgruntled staff member to gain access to an organization's resources or sensitive information, this is classified as an insider attack.Insider attacks are perpetrated by individuals within the organization, such as employees, contractors, or business associates, who have inside information concerning the organization's security practices, data, and computer systems. The threat from insiders can be intentional, as in the case of a disgruntled employee seeking to harm the organization, or unintentional, where an employee is manipulated or coerced by external parties without realizing the implications of their actions. Phishing attacks, footprinting, and identity theft represent different types of cybersecurity threats where the attacker's method or objective differs from that of insider attacks.References:The ECIH v3 certification program addresses various types of threats, including insider threats, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and mitigating risks posed by individuals within the organization.

When an attacker installs a fake AP (Access Point) within a company's network, especially behind a firewall, this constitutes the deployment of a Rogue Access Point. Rogue APs are unauthorized wireless access points installed within a network without the network administrator's knowledge or consent. They pose a significant security risk because they can be used to intercept sensitive information, bypass network security configurations, and provide a gateway for attackers to enter the network undetected. This type of attack circumvents the security measures put in place by a company, including firewalls, by creating an illicit entry point into the network that is under the control of the attacker.References:Incident Handler (ECIH v3) courses and study materials discuss various network-based attacks and their mitigation strategies, emphasizing the importance of regular network scans to detect and remove rogue access points and thus secure the network from unauthorized access.

Farheen's activity of using the DD tool to create a sector-by-sector mirror image of the original disk is an example of system preservation. This process is crucial in digital forensics for creating an exact copy of a storage device to ensure that the original data remains unchanged during the investigation. By making a forensic duplication, or image, of the disk, Farheen ensures that the static data on the disk is preserved in its current state for thorough analysis, without altering the original evidence. This step allows investigators to work with a precise replica of the data, protecting the integrity of the original evidence.References:The Incident Handler (ECIH v3) certification materials discuss various methods and tools for data acquisition and preservation, highlighting the importance of system preservation in the initial stages of forensic analysis.

In the described attack, where attackers pose as legitimate access points (APs) by beaconing the WLAN's SSID to lure users, the attack is known as an Evil twin AP attack. This type of attack involves setting up a rogue AP with the same SSID as a legitimate wireless access point, making it appear as an authorized network to users. Unsuspecting users may connect to this malicious AP, allowing attackers to intercept sensitive information, conduct man-in-the-middle attacks, or distribute malware. The Evil twin AP attack exploits the trust users have in known SSIDs to compromise their security.References:Incident Handler (ECIH v3) certification materials discuss various confidentiality and network attacks, including Evil twin AP attacks, highlighting their mechanisms and how to defend against them.

True attribution in the context of cyber incidents involves the identification of the actual individuals, groups, or entities behind an attack. This can include pinpointing specific persons, organizations, societies, or even countries that sponsor or carry out cyber intrusions or attacks. Alexis's efforts to identify and attribute the actors behind a recent attack by distinguishing the specific origins of the threat align with the concept of true attribution, which goes beyond mere speculation to provide concrete evidence about the perpetrators.

References:Threat attribution, especially true attribution, is a complex and nuanced area within cyber incident response, dealing with the identification of attackers. This concept iscovered in cybersecurity courses and certifications, such as the ECIH v3 by EC-Council, focusing on the methodologies and challenges associated with attributing cyber attacks to their true sources.

When Joseph, the IH&R team lead, alerted service providers, developers, and manufacturers about the affected resources, he was engaged in the Containment stage of the Incident Handling and Response (IH&R) process. Containment involves taking steps to limit the spread or impact of an incident and to isolate affected systems to prevent further damage. Alerting relevant stakeholders, including service providers and developers, is part of containment efforts to ensure that the threat does not escalate and that measures are taken to protect unaffected resources. This stage precedes eradication and recovery, focusing on immediate response actions to secure the environment.References:The ECIH v3 certification program outlines the IH&R process stages, explaining the roles and actions involved in containment, including communication with external and internal stakeholders to manage and mitigate the incident's effects.

The scenario described fits the characteristics of an Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) attack. APTs are sophisticated, stealthy, and continuous computer hacking processes often orchestrated by groups targeting a specific entity. These attackers penetrate the network through vulnerabilities, maintain access without detection, and achieve their objectives, such as data exfiltration or financial theft, over an extended period. The fact that attackers exploited a minor vulnerability, maintained access for six months, and performed lateral movements to access critical systems for fraudulent transactions highlights the strategic planning and persistence typical of APT attacks.References:Incident Handler (ECIH v3) certification materials discuss APTs in detail, including their methodologies, objectives, and the importance of comprehensive security strategies to detect and mitigate such threats.

In Wireshark, the filtericmp.type==8is used to detect ping sweep attempts. ICMP type 8 messages are echo requests, which are used in ping operations to check the availability of a network device. A ping sweep involves sending ICMP echo requests to multiple addresses to discover active devices on a network. By filtering for ICMP type 8 messages in Wireshark, Bran can identify these echo requests, helping to pinpoint ping sweep activities on the network.

References:Wireshark, as a network protocol analyzer, is frequently discussed in the ECIH v3 program, with particular emphasis on its utility in detecting network reconnaissance activities like ping sweeps through specific filter usage.

In a Linux environment, email servers such as Sendmail log events, including details about sent and received emails, in a specific log file. The correct directory and file for examining email logs, particularly for Sendmail and using Syslog for logging, is /Var/log/maillog. Thisfile contains vital information for forensic and incident response purposes, including source and destination IP addresses, email addresses, timestamps, and other data relevant to the email traffic handled by the server. By analyzing this log, incident responders can gather evidence related to email-based incidents, trace the source of malicious emails, and understand the scope of an incident. It's crucial for individuals like Khai, who are tasked with examining logs, to know the correct log file locations and their contents to effectively validate and analyze email header information and other relevant data.

References:Incident Handler (ECIH v3) study materials often cover the logging mechanisms of common services and applications on Linux systems, including email servers like Sendmail, and the importance of log files like /var/log/maillog in incident investigation and response activities.

Process memory (RAM) is a type of digital evidence that is temporarily stored and requires a constant power supply to retain information. If the power supply is interrupted, the information stored in process memory is lost. This type of evidence can include data about running programs, user actions, system events, and more, making it crucial for forensic analysis, especially in identifying actions taken by both users and malware. Collecting data from process memory helps incident responders understand the state of the system at the time of an incident and can reveal valuable information that is not persisted elsewhere on the device.

References:Incident handling and response training, such as the ECIH v3 program, emphasize the importance of collecting and analyzing volatile data, including process memory, to effectively investigate and respond to cybersecurity incidents.

In Wireshark, to identify ICMP ping sweep attempts, the filtericmp.type == 8 or icmp.type ==0is used. This filter captures ICMP echo requests and echo replies, which are indicative of ping commands. Type 8 represents an echo request used when a source sends a ping, and type 0 represents an echo reply, which is the response from the target. By filtering for these ICMP types, Miko can detect a surge in ping requests across the network, which could indicate a ping sweep attempt—an exploratory activity often used by attackers to discover active hosts on a network by sending ping requests to multiple addresses.References:Incident Handler (ECIH v3) courses and study guides often incorporate training on using network analysis tools like Wireshark, including how to use filters to detect specific types of network activities and potential threats.

Email Dossier is a tool designed to perform detailed investigations on email messages to verify their authenticity and trace their origin. It can analyze email headers and provide information about the route an email has taken, the servers it passed through, and potentially malicious links or origins. For an incident handler like Stenley, tasked with verifying the validity of emails and containing malicious email threats, Email Dossier serves as a practical tool for analyzing and validating emails received by employees. By using this tool, Stenley can identify fraudulent or suspicious emails, thereby helping to protect the organization from phishing attacks, malware distribution, and other email-based threats.

References:In the context of managing and mitigating the risks associated with email communications, ECIH v3 study materials outline various tools and techniques for email analysis and validation. These resources recommend the use of tools like Email Dossier for incident handlers to effectively scrutinize incoming emails for security threats.

MxToolbox is a comprehensive tool designed for analyzing email headers and diagnosing various email delivery issues. When Francis received a spoofed email asking for his bank information, using MxToolbox to analyze the email headers would be appropriate. This tool helps in examining the source of the email, tracking the email's path across the internet from the sender to the receiver, and identifying any signs of email spoofing or malicious activity. It provides detailed information about the email servers encountered along the way and can help in verifying the authenticity of the email sender. Other options like EventLog Analyzer, Email Checker, and PoliteMail are tools used for different purposes such as analyzing system event logs, checking email address validity, and managing email communications, respectively, and do not specifically focus on analyzing email headers to the extent required for investigating a spoofed email incident.References:The use of MxToolbox in incident handling and email security analysis is commonly recommended in Incident Handler (ECIH v3) study materials as a practical tool for email header analysis and spoofing investigation.

System characterization is the process of defining the boundaries of an IT system, which includes identifying the resources, information, and functionality that constitute the system. This process is crucial for understanding the scope of the system, the data it processes, and the technology it employs. By characterizing a system, incident handlers can better understand the system's normal operations and behaviors, which is essential for identifying anomalies that may indicate a security incident. System characterization involves documenting the hardware, software, network configuration, data flows, and other critical elements of the IT environment. This foundational knowledge supports effective incident handling by providing a baseline against which suspicious activities can be compared.

References:EC-Council's Certified Incident Handler (ECIH v3) courses and study guides emphasize the importance of system characterization in the incident handling and response process. It serves as a prerequisite for subsequent steps such as threat identification, vulnerability identification, and the implementation of appropriate controls.

A Denial of Service (DoS) attack aims to make a computer resource, network, or application unavailable to its intended users, thereby preventing legitimate users from using the service. This is achieved by overwhelming the target with a flood of internet traffic or sending information that triggers a crash. In contrast, fraud and theft involve the unauthorized acquisition of data or assets, unauthorized access refers to gaining entry into systems without permission, and malicious code or insider threat attacks relate to software designed to cause harm or unauthorized actions by trusted users within the organization. The specific intent of a DoS attack is to disrupt service, making it a distinct category focused on denial of availability.References:The Incident Handler (ECIH v3) certification materials discuss various types of cybersecurity threats, including DoS attacks, outlining their methods, objectives, and impacts on targeted systems or networks.

A Trojan, short for Trojan horse, is a type of malicious software that misleads users of its true intent. It disguises itself as a legitimate and useful program, but once executed, it allows unauthorized access to the user's system. Unlike viruses and worms, Trojans do not replicate themselves but can be just as destructive. They are often used to create a backdoor to a computer system, allowing an attacker to gain access to the system or to deliver other malware. Trojans can be used for a variety of purposes, including stealing information, downloading or uploading files, monitoring the user's screen and keyboard, and more. The term "Trojan" comes from the Greek story of the wooden horse that was used to sneak soldiers into the city of Troy, which is analogous to the deceptive nature of this type of malware in cyber security.

References:The EC-Council's Certified Incident Handler (ECIH v3) program covers various types of malware, including Trojans, in detail, explaining their mechanisms, how they can be identified, and the steps to take in response to such threats.

As of my last update, the most recent NIST standard for incident response was NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2 (800-61r2), titled "Computer Security Incident Handling Guide." This document provides guidelines for establishing an effective incident response program, including preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident activity.

References:The document is a key resource in the field of incident response, frequently cited in the ECIH v3 curriculum for its comprehensive guidelines on managing and responding to cybersecurity incidents.

Eradication is the phase in the incident response process where the root cause of an incident is removed or eliminated, and all attack vectors are closed to prevent similar incidents in the future. This step follows the containment phase, where the immediate threat is isolated to prevent further damage, and precedes the recovery phase, where normal operations are restored. Eradication involves thoroughly removing malware, unauthorized access mechanisms, or any other elements used in the attack, and securing any vulnerabilities that were exploited. The goal is to ensure that the threat cannot re-emerge and that the systems are secure before they are returned to operational status.References:The EC-Council's Incident Handler (ECIH v3) certification guide outlines the incident response process, including the specific tasks involved in the eradication phase, to ensure that incident handlers are prepared to effectively remove threats from an organization's environment.

In the practice of digital forensics and incident handling, evidence bags play a crucial role in preserving the integrity and chain of custody of physical and digital evidence. The information typically included in the documentation on evidence bags encompasses the date and time of seizure, which provides a timestamp for when the evidence was collected; the exhibit number, which is a unique identifier assigned to each piece of evidence for tracking and reference purposes; and the name of the incident responder or individual who collected the evidence, ensuring accountability and traceability. This documentation is essential for maintaining the chain of custody, a critical element in legal proceedings, as it helps establish the evidence's authenticity and integrity by detailing its handling from collection to presentation in court. Options A, B, and C describe types of digital evidence but are not directly related to the content typically documented on evidence bags.References:Incident Handler (ECIH v3) courses and study guides emphasize the importance of accurately documenting evidence bags as part of the evidence collection and preservation process in incident handling and digital forensics.

Obfuscation is a technique used to make data or code difficult to understand. It is often employed by attackers to conceal the true intent of their code or communications, making it harder for security professionals, automated tools, and others to analyze or detect malicious activity. Obfuscation can involve the use of ambiguous or misleading language, as well as more technical methods such as encoding, encryption, or the use of nonsensical variable names in source code to hide its true functionality.

References:The ECIH v3 program discusses various techniques attackers use to evade detection, including obfuscation, highlighting how it complicates the analysis and understanding of malicious payloads.

URL encoding, also known as percent-encoding, is a mechanism for encoding information in a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) under certain circumstances. This technique involves replacing unsafe ASCII characters with a "%" followed by two hexadecimal digits that represent the character's ASCII code. This is necessary for embedding characters that are not allowed in URLs directly, such as spaces and symbols, or characters that have special meanings within URLs, ensuring that the URL is correctly interpreted by web browsers and servers.

References:The concept of URL encoding is fundamental to web application security, a topic that is covered in the ECIH v3 program by EC-Council. Understanding encoding techniques is crucial for incident handlers dealing with web-based attacks and investigations.

Thenetstat -abcommand is useful in Windows operating systems for displaying all connections and listening ports, along with the executable involved in creating each connection or listening port. This can be particularly valuable for an incident responder like James when attempting to determine which processes are running on a system and how they are communicating over the network. This information can help identify malicious processes, unauthorized connections, or other signs of compromise on the system. Whilenetstat -abdoes not exclusively list executable files for running processes, it ties processes to network activity, which is a critical part of collecting volatile information during a cybersecurity incident investigation.

References:The Certified Incident Handler (ECIH v3) course by EC-Council covers various commands and tools that can be used to collect volatile data from systems as part of incident response activities, highlighting the importance of understanding network connections and the processes responsible for them.

Autopsy is a digital forensics platform and graphical interface to The Sleuth Kit and other digital forensics tools. It is used by law enforcement, military, and corporate examiners to investigate what happened on a computer. Autopsy enables incident handlers to view the file system, retrieve deleted data, perform timeline analysis, and analyze web artifacts, among other functionalities. This tool is particularly useful during the incident response process for conducting in-depth investigations into the nature of a security incident, identifying the methods used by attackers, and recovering lost or compromised data.

References:The EC-Council's Certified Incident Handler (ECIH v3) program covers digital forensic tools and techniques, highlighting the capabilities of Autopsy for supporting comprehensive incident investigations and response activities.

Top of Form

Synthetic identity theft is a type of fraud where the perpetrator combines real (often stolen) and fake information to create a new identity. This can include combining a real social security number with a fictitious name, or other variations that result in an identity that is not entirely real but has elements that can pass through verification processes. In the scenario described, Adam is creating a new identity using information from different victims,which is characteristic of synthetic identity theft. This type of fraud is particularly challenging to detect and counter because it does not directly impersonate a single real individual but creates a plausible new identity that can be used to open accounts, obtain credit, and conduct transactions that can be financially beneficial to the attacker.

References:The concept and techniques of synthetic identity theft are covered in detail in the Incident Handler (ECIH v3) curriculum, where the focus is on identifying, understanding, and mitigating various forms of identity theft, including synthetic identity theft, as part of incident response activities.

Incident triage is the phase in the Incident Handling and Response (IH&R) process where identified security incidents are analyzed, validated, categorized, and prioritized. This step is crucial for determining the severity of incidents and deciding on the order in which they should be addressed. During triage, incident handlers assess the impact, urgency, and potential harm of an incident to prioritize their response efforts effectively. This ensuresthat resources are allocated efficiently, and the most critical incidents are handled first. Incident recording and assignment involve logging incidents and assigning them to handlers, containment focuses on limiting the extent of damage, and notification involves informing stakeholders about the incident.References:The Incident Handler (ECIH v3) courses and study guides detail the IH&R process, emphasizing the importance of triage in managing and responding to security incidents effectively.